StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. CMake vs xmake

CMake vs xmake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CMake
CMake
Stacks4.0K
Followers294
Votes1
xmake
xmake
Stacks6
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.5K
Forks880

CMake vs xmake: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CMake and xmake are both build systems that help in the compilation and building of software projects. However, there are key differences between these two tools.

**1. CMake: CMake is a cross-platform build system that generates native build files, such as Makefiles or IDE project files. It uses a CMakeLists.txt file to configure the build process.

xmake: xmake, on the other hand, is a lightweight and easy-to-use build tool specifically designed for cross-platform development. It uses a Lua-based script (xmake.lua) for project configuration, which makes it more flexible compared to CMake's CMakeLists.txt.

**2. CMake: CMake supports a wide range of programming languages, including C++, C, Fortran, Python, and more. It provides a consistent and unified interface for building projects regardless of the programming language used.

xmake: xmake mainly focuses on C and C++ development, and it provides a simplified build system specifically tailored for these languages. While it can still be used for other programming languages, its primary strengths lie in C and C++ development.

**3. CMake: CMake has a larger community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of plugins and modules available. It is widely adopted and supported by various development tools and IDEs.

xmake: xmake, although relatively newer compared to CMake, has a growing community and an active set of contributors. It may have a smaller ecosystem and available plugins compared to CMake, but it offers a more streamlined and simplified user experience for C and C++ developers.

**4. CMake: CMake provides a rich feature set, including support for configuring compiler flags, linking libraries, handling dependencies, and setting up tests and installations. It also offers support for generating different types of build files for various platforms and IDEs.

xmake: xmake aims to provide a more straightforward and intuitive build system. It offers a more minimalistic approach with a focus on simplicity and efficiency. While it may not have as many advanced features as CMake, it excels in quickly setting up and building projects with ease.

**5. CMake: CMake is widely used in large-scale projects and complex build systems due to its flexibility and extensive configuration options. It allows fine-grained control over the build process and supports advanced build scenarios, such as multi-module and multi-configuration builds.

xmake: xmake is more suitable for small to medium-sized projects, especially those focused on C and C++ development. It offers a more opinionated approach to building and has a more straightforward configuration file structure, which can lead to faster iteration times and reduced build complexity.

**6. CMake: CMake supports integration with various popular IDEs, including Visual Studio, Xcode, and Eclipse. It allows developers to generate project files for these IDEs and seamlessly work with them.

xmake: xmake also supports integration with IDEs but primarily focuses on a text-based workflow. It encourages developers to use command-line tools and terminal-based workflows for building and managing their projects.

In Summary, CMake is a powerful and flexible build system with extensive community support and a wide range of features, suitable for large-scale and complex projects. On the other hand, xmake offers a simplified and streamlined experience specifically targeted towards C and C++ development, with a focus on speed and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CMake
CMake
xmake
xmake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

It is a cross-platform build utility based on lua. It focuses on making development and building easier and provides many features (e.g package, install, plugin, macro, action, option, task ...), so that any developer can quickly pick it up and enjoy a productivity boost when developing and building projects.

-
Cross-platform; Support multi-language; Hybrid compilation; Modern C/C++ build tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
880
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
6
Followers
294
Followers
13
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Has package registry
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Golang
Golang
Swift
Swift
Linux
Linux
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
C++
C++
Objective-C
Objective-C
Windows
Windows
Rust
Rust
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
CUDA
CUDA

What are some alternatives to CMake, xmake?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

biicode

biicode

For C/C++ developers that think a dependency manager is needed, biicode is a multiplatform tool and hosting service that allows you to build your projects easily, integrate third party code and reuse code among projects with just #includes

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana