StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. CMake vs Make

CMake vs Make

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CMake
CMake
Stacks4.0K
Followers294
Votes1
Make
Make
Stacks323
Followers129
Votes1

CMake vs Make: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CMake and Make are both build automation tools used in software development. Although they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Build System Language: CMake uses its own scripting language called "CMake language" to define the build process, while Make uses Makefile, a declarative language, to specify instructions for compiling and linking code.

  2. Platform Independence: CMake aims to provide a cross-platform build system by generating native build files for various platforms, such as Makefiles for Linux/Unix systems. In contrast, Make is primarily used on Unix-like systems, and the Makefiles it generates may not be compatible with other platforms.

  3. Dependency Tracking: CMake has built-in support for automatic dependency tracking. It can detect changes in source code files and automatically regenerate the build files when necessary. Make, on the other hand, relies on manually specifying dependencies in the Makefile, requiring developers to update these dependencies manually.

  4. Ease of Use: CMake provides a more user-friendly and intuitive syntax compared to Make. Its scripting language is designed to be less verbose and more readable, making it easier for developers to understand and maintain the build process. Makefiles, on the other hand, can be complex and difficult to grasp, especially for beginners.

  5. Customizability: CMake offers a greater level of customization and flexibility compared to Make. It provides a wide range of built-in functions and variables that developers can use to fine-tune the build process. Make, although powerful, has a more limited set of built-in features and may require more manual configuration for advanced customization.

  6. Integration with IDEs: CMake has better integration with modern Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Visual Studio and CLion. It can generate project files that IDEs understand and provide an easier and more feature-rich development experience. Make, on the other hand, lacks such seamless integration and often requires additional plugin/configuration to work with IDEs.

In summary, CMake differs from Make by using its own build system language, providing cross-platform compatibility, automatic dependency tracking, being more user-friendly, offering greater customization options, and having better IDE integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CMake
CMake
Make
Make

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

The GNU Compiler Collection and GNU Toolchain (Binutils, GDB, GLIBC)

Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
323
Followers
294
Followers
129
Votes
1
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Has package registry
Pros
  • 1
    No-nonsense approach to builds. Just works
  • 0
    One-line Execution

What are some alternatives to CMake, Make?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Telosys

Telosys

It is an Open Source code generator. It generates the plumbing and repetitive code for any kind of language. It has been designed to be light and very simple to use.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Optic

Optic

Optic is an open-source tool that automatically documents and tests your API. It makes it easy to keep your API specification and code in sync and automates your contract testing.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp