Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Cloudera Enterprise vs Google BigQuery: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Cloudera Enterprise and Google BigQuery
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Cloudera Enterprise and Google BigQuery.
Data Processing Frameworks: Cloudera Enterprise provides a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of data processing frameworks, such as Hadoop, Spark, and Hive. On the other hand, Google BigQuery is a fully managed service that focuses on SQL-based querying and analysis. While Cloudera offers more flexibility and supports various frameworks for complex data processing tasks, BigQuery simplifies querying and analysis with its SQL-centric approach.
Infrastructure Management: Cloudera Enterprise allows users to set up and manage their own on-premises or cloud-based infrastructure using Cloudera Manager. It offers greater control and customization options for infrastructure management. In contrast, Google BigQuery is a fully managed service that abstracts the infrastructure layer, relieving users from the burden of infrastructure management. Users can simply focus on their data analysis tasks without worrying about infrastructure scalability or maintenance.
Data Storage: Cloudera Enterprise utilizes the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) for storing and processing data. It offers a distributed, fault-tolerant storage system that can handle large volumes of data. On the other hand, Google BigQuery employs its proprietary storage system that is optimized for cloud-based data warehousing and analytics. BigQuery's storage system is designed to operate at scale and provide high-performance querying capabilities.
Scalability and Concurrency: Cloudera Enterprise allows users to scale their clusters horizontally by adding more servers to handle increased workloads. It also supports concurrent processing, enabling multiple users to run jobs simultaneously. Google BigQuery, being a fully managed service, automatically scales its resources to handle query workloads. It provides high scalability and supports concurrent querying to enable fast and efficient data analysis for multiple users.
Data Replication and Availability: Cloudera Enterprise offers features like data replication and fault tolerance to ensure data availability and reliability. It supports replication across multiple data centers for disaster recovery and high availability. On the other hand, Google BigQuery replicates data across multiple regions to provide durability and availability. It automatically handles data replication and ensures data integrity, minimizing the risk of data loss.
Costs and Pricing Model: Cloudera Enterprise is typically licensed based on a subscription model, where users pay for the software and support. The cost would depend on factors like the number of nodes, the level of support, and additional features. Google BigQuery, on the other hand, follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the amount of data processed and the storage used. Users only pay for the resources they actually utilize, with no upfront costs or long-term commitments.
In summary, Cloudera Enterprise provides a comprehensive data platform with support for various data processing frameworks, flexibility in infrastructure management, and options for data replication. Google BigQuery, on the other hand, is a fully managed service that simplifies data analysis with its SQL-centric approach, automatic scalability, and cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing model.
Cloud Data-warehouse is the centerpiece of modern Data platform. The choice of the most suitable solution is therefore fundamental.
Our benchmark was conducted over BigQuery and Snowflake. These solutions seem to match our goals but they have very different approaches.
BigQuery is notably the only 100% serverless cloud data-warehouse, which requires absolutely NO maintenance: no re-clustering, no compression, no index optimization, no storage management, no performance management. Snowflake requires to set up (paid) reclustering processes, to manage the performance allocated to each profile, etc. We can also mention Redshift, which we have eliminated because this technology requires even more ops operation.
BigQuery can therefore be set up with almost zero cost of human resources. Its on-demand pricing is particularly adapted to small workloads. 0 cost when the solution is not used, only pay for the query you're running. But quickly the use of slots (with monthly or per-minute commitment) will drastically reduce the cost of use. We've reduced by 10 the cost of our nightly batches by using flex slots.
Finally, a major advantage of BigQuery is its almost perfect integration with Google Cloud Platform services: Cloud functions, Dataflow, Data Studio, etc.
BigQuery is still evolving very quickly. The next milestone, BigQuery Omni, will allow to run queries over data stored in an external Cloud platform (Amazon S3 for example). It will be a major breakthrough in the history of cloud data-warehouses. Omni will compensate a weakness of BigQuery: transferring data in near real time from S3 to BQ is not easy today. It was even simpler to implement via Snowflake's Snowpipe solution.
We also plan to use the Machine Learning features built into BigQuery to accelerate our deployment of Data-Science-based projects. An opportunity only offered by the BigQuery solution
Pros of Cloudera Enterprise
- Scalability1
- Multicloud1
- Hybrid cloud1
- Easily management1
- Cheeper1
Pros of Google BigQuery
- High Performance28
- Easy to use25
- Fully managed service22
- Cheap Pricing19
- Process hundreds of GB in seconds16
- Big Data12
- Full table scans in seconds, no indexes needed11
- Always on, no per-hour costs8
- Good combination with fluentd6
- Machine learning4
- Easy to manage1
- Easy to learn0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Cloudera Enterprise
Cons of Google BigQuery
- You can't unit test changes in BQ data1
- Sdas0