Lodash vs clipboard.js

Overview

Lodash

Stacks10.7K

Followers886

Votes3

GitHub Stars61.3K

Forks7.1K

clipboard.js

Stacks809

Followers34

Votes0

GitHub Stars34.2K

Forks3.9K

Lodash vs clipboard.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: Lodash and clipboard.js are both popular JavaScript libraries used for different purposes. Understanding the key differences between the two can help developers choose the right tool for their specific needs.

Functionality: Lodash primarily focuses on providing utility functions for common programming tasks such as iteration, manipulation, and data processing, while clipboard.js specifically deals with copying text to the clipboard from a webpage.
Dependencies: Lodash is a standalone library that does not have any external dependencies and can be easily integrated into various projects, whereas clipboard.js requires the presence of the document.execCommand method, which may limit its compatibility.
Community Support: Lodash has a large and active community with regular updates and contributions, providing comprehensive documentation and support forums, while clipboard.js has a smaller community in comparison, which may result in slower updates and fewer resources for troubleshooting.
Usage Scope: Lodash is more versatile and can be used across a wide range of projects for tasks related to data manipulation and enhancement of JavaScript functionality, whereas clipboard.js is more specialized and is mainly used for specific clipboard-related tasks where copying text is required.
Performance: Lodash includes a wide range of utility functions that may not always be used, leading to potential overhead in terms of file size and performance impact, while clipboard.js is lightweight and focuses on a single functionality, resulting in optimized performance for its specific task.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Lodash and clipboard.js can help developers choose the right tool based on their specific requirements, functionality, dependencies, community support, usage scope, and performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Lodash, clipboard.js

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash	clipboard.js
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.	Copying text to the clipboard shouldn't be hard. It shouldn't require dozens of steps to configure or hundreds of KBs to load. But most of all, it shouldn't depend on Flash or any bloated framework. That's why this tool exists.
-	Modern copy to clipboard;No Flash;Just 3kb gzipped
Statistics
GitHub Stars 61.3K	GitHub Stars 34.2K
GitHub Forks 7.1K	GitHub Forks 3.9K
Stacks 10.7K	Stacks 809
Followers 886	Followers 34
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Better than Underscore 1 Simple 0 Better that Underscore Cons 1 It reduce the performance	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	JavaScript HTML5 Firefox Google Chrome Opera Browser

What are some alternatives to Lodash, clipboard.js?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Lodash vs clipboard.js: What are the differences?

Functionality: Lodash primarily focuses on providing utility functions for common programming tasks such as iteration, manipulation, and data processing, while clipboard.js specifically deals with copying text to the clipboard from a webpage.
Dependencies: Lodash is a standalone library that does not have any external dependencies and can be easily integrated into various projects, whereas clipboard.js requires the presence of the document.execCommand method, which may limit its compatibility.
Community Support: Lodash has a large and active community with regular updates and contributions, providing comprehensive documentation and support forums, while clipboard.js has a smaller community in comparison, which may result in slower updates and fewer resources for troubleshooting.
Usage Scope: Lodash is more versatile and can be used across a wide range of projects for tasks related to data manipulation and enhancement of JavaScript functionality, whereas clipboard.js is more specialized and is mainly used for specific clipboard-related tasks where copying text is required.
Performance: Lodash includes a wide range of utility functions that may not always be used, leading to potential overhead in terms of file size and performance impact, while clipboard.js is lightweight and focuses on a single functionality, resulting in optimized performance for its specific task.

Lodash vs clipboard.js

Overview