ClamAV vs Sophos

Overview

ClamAV

Stacks49

Followers67

Votes0

Sophos

Stacks19

Followers38

Votes0

ClamAV vs Sophos: What are the differences?

Introduction: ClamAV and Sophos are both antivirus software solutions that provide protection against malware and other security threats. However, they differ in several key aspects.

Detection Methods: ClamAV primarily utilizes signature-based detection, which involves comparing file signatures to a database of known malware signatures. In contrast, Sophos incorporates a combination of signature-based detection, behavioral analysis, and machine learning algorithms to detect and prevent malware infections.
Operating Systems Supported: ClamAV is primarily built for Unix-based systems and is commonly used on mail servers. It also has limited support for Windows and macOS. On the other hand, Sophos offers support for a wider range of operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and virtual environments.
User Interface: ClamAV typically operates from the command line interface (CLI) and lacks a graphical user interface (GUI). This makes it a better choice for advanced users comfortable with CLI operations. Sophos, on the other hand, provides a more user-friendly GUI, allowing easier management and configuration for less experienced users.
Additional Features: Sophos offers a broader range of features beyond antivirus protection. It includes functionalities like web filtering, application control, data loss prevention, and email encryption. ClamAV, on the other hand, focuses solely on malware detection and does not offer these additional features.
Licenses and Pricing: ClamAV is an open-source software released under the GNU General Public License (GPL). It is free to use and modify, making it a cost-effective option for individuals and organizations with limited budgets. In contrast, Sophos typically operates under a commercial licensing model, which involves payment for usage and additional functionalities.
Scalability and Enterprise Support: Sophos generally provides better scalability and comprehensive enterprise support. It offers centralized management, multi-platform deployment, and integration with other security tools. ClamAV, being primarily designed for mail servers, may not be as suitable for large-scale enterprise environments with diverse infrastructures.

In summary, ClamAV focuses on signature-based detection, has limited OS support, lacks a GUI, and offers only basic antivirus protection, while Sophos combines different detection methods, supports multiple operating systems, includes a user-friendly GUI, offers extensive features beyond antivirus, and provides better scalability and enterprise support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ClamAV	Sophos
It is an open source antivirus engine for detecting trojans, viruses, malware & other malicious threats.	It is Cybersecurity Evolved. Advanced Endpoint Protection and Network Security Fully Synchronized in Real Time.
Email scanning; Web scanning; End point security; Flexible and scalable multi-threaded daemon; Command line scanner; Advanced tool for automatic database updates.	Deep Learning; Anti-Exploit; Anti-Ransomware
Statistics
Stacks 49	Stacks 19
Followers 67	Followers 38
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Windows Ubuntu Debian CentOS Linux macOS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ClamAV, Sophos?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

ClamAV vs Sophos: What are the differences?

Introduction: ClamAV and Sophos are both antivirus software solutions that provide protection against malware and other security threats. However, they differ in several key aspects.

Detection Methods: ClamAV primarily utilizes signature-based detection, which involves comparing file signatures to a database of known malware signatures. In contrast, Sophos incorporates a combination of signature-based detection, behavioral analysis, and machine learning algorithms to detect and prevent malware infections.
Operating Systems Supported: ClamAV is primarily built for Unix-based systems and is commonly used on mail servers. It also has limited support for Windows and macOS. On the other hand, Sophos offers support for a wider range of operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and virtual environments.
User Interface: ClamAV typically operates from the command line interface (CLI) and lacks a graphical user interface (GUI). This makes it a better choice for advanced users comfortable with CLI operations. Sophos, on the other hand, provides a more user-friendly GUI, allowing easier management and configuration for less experienced users.
Additional Features: Sophos offers a broader range of features beyond antivirus protection. It includes functionalities like web filtering, application control, data loss prevention, and email encryption. ClamAV, on the other hand, focuses solely on malware detection and does not offer these additional features.
Licenses and Pricing: ClamAV is an open-source software released under the GNU General Public License (GPL). It is free to use and modify, making it a cost-effective option for individuals and organizations with limited budgets. In contrast, Sophos typically operates under a commercial licensing model, which involves payment for usage and additional functionalities.
Scalability and Enterprise Support: Sophos generally provides better scalability and comprehensive enterprise support. It offers centralized management, multi-platform deployment, and integration with other security tools. ClamAV, being primarily designed for mail servers, may not be as suitable for large-scale enterprise environments with diverse infrastructures.

ClamAV vs Sophos

Overview