StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Cherokee vs Puma

Cherokee vs Puma

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Puma
Puma
Stacks1.2K
Followers265
Votes20
GitHub Stars7.8K
Forks1.5K
Cherokee
Cherokee
Stacks4
Followers26
Votes4

Cherokee vs Puma: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Cherokee and Puma

Cherokee and Puma are both popular SUV models, but they have some key differences that set them apart. 

1. **Design and size**: One significant difference between Cherokee and Puma is their design and size. The Cherokee is generally larger and more rugged-looking, catering to drivers who prioritize off-road capabilities. On the other hand, the Puma tends to be sleeker and more compact, appealing to urban drivers looking for a stylish SUV.

2. **Technology features**: When it comes to technology features, Cherokee and Puma also differ. The Cherokee is known for its advanced off-road technology, including different drive modes and terrain management systems. In contrast, the Puma focuses more on smart connectivity features, such as advanced infotainment systems and driver-assist technologies for city driving.

3. **Performance and engine options**: Another key difference between Cherokee and Puma is their performance and engine options. The Cherokee often offers more powerful engine choices, suitable for towing or navigating challenging terrains. The Puma, on the other hand, may prioritize fuel efficiency and urban agility with smaller engine options.

4. **Price point and target market**: Cherokee and Puma also differ in terms of price point and target market. The Cherokee tends to be priced higher, targeting customers who value its larger size and off-road capabilities. In comparison, the Puma may be more affordable, attracting urban dwellers seeking a stylish and compact SUV for city driving.

5. **Interior and cargo space**: In terms of interior and cargo space, Cherokee and Puma offer distinct features. The Cherokee typically provides more interior room and cargo space, making it a practical choice for families or outdoor enthusiasts. Conversely, the Puma may offer a more refined and comfortable interior, suitable for daily commuting or city driving.

6. **Brand heritage and reputation**: Lastly, Cherokee and Puma have different brand heritages and reputations. Cherokee is rooted in Jeep's iconic legacy of producing rugged and reliable vehicles, appealing to adventure seekers and outdoor enthusiasts. In contrast, Puma is associated with Ford's reputation for innovation and modern design, attracting customers seeking a blend of style and technology in their SUV.

In Summary, Cherokee and Puma stand out from each other in terms of design, technology features, performance, price point, interior space, and brand reputation, catering to distinct preferences and lifestyles in the SUV market.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Puma, Cherokee

Mark
Mark

Software Developer at Nouveta

Mar 4, 2022

Needs adviceonRailsRailsRubyRubyPumaPuma

I have an integration service that pulls data from third party systems saves it and returns it to the user of the service. We can pull large data sets with the service and response JSON can go up to 5MB with gzip compression. I currently use Rails 6 and Ruby 2.7.2 and Puma web server. Slow clients tend to prevent other users from accessing the system. Am considering a switch to Unicorn.

38.5k views38.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Puma
Puma
Cherokee
Cherokee

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
4
Followers
265
Followers
26
Votes
20
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Free
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Convenient
  • 2
    Default Rails server
  • 2
    Multithreaded
Cons
  • 0
    Uses `select` (limited client count)
Pros
  • 4
    The logo is cute

What are some alternatives to Puma, Cherokee?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase