StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Cherokee vs Jetty

Cherokee vs Jetty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cherokee
Cherokee
Stacks4
Followers26
Votes4
Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47

Cherokee vs Jetty: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Cherokee and Jetty

Cherokee and Jetty are both web servers used for hosting websites or web applications, but they differ in several key aspects.

1. **Performance**: Cherokee is known for its high performance due to its lightweight architecture and advanced caching mechanisms, making it an excellent choice for high-traffic websites. On the other hand, Jetty is widely recognized for its scalability and ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.

2. **Configuration**: Cherokee offers a user-friendly web interface for easy configuration, making it simple for beginners to set up and manage their websites. In contrast, Jetty relies heavily on XML configuration files, which can be more complex and require a deeper understanding of the system.

3. **Supported Technologies**: Cherokee primarily focuses on supporting traditional web technologies like PHP and Ruby on Rails, making it suitable for standard web applications. In contrast, Jetty is known for its extensive support for Java-based technologies, including Servlets, JSP, and WebSocket, making it ideal for Java web development.

4. **Community and Support**: Jetty has a larger and more active community compared to Cherokee, providing users with a wealth of resources, tutorials, and community support. Cherokee, while still maintained, may have fewer available resources and community engagement.

5. **Security Features**: Cherokee comes with built-in security features like SSL/TLS support, URL rewriting, and IP blocking to enhance website security. Jetty also offers robust security features, including support for secure password handling, authentication mechanisms, and encrypted communication.

6. **Scalability**: Jetty is known for its scalability and ability to handle a high volume of concurrent connections, making it a top choice for applications with varying traffic patterns. Cherokee, while capable of handling moderate traffic, may not scale as efficiently as Jetty in high-demand scenarios.

In Summary, Cherokee excels in performance and ease of configuration, while Jetty shines in scalability, Java technology support, and community backing. Both web servers have unique strengths that cater to different needs and preferences in web hosting. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cherokee
Cherokee
Jetty
Jetty

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

-
Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
510
Followers
26
Followers
311
Votes
4
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    The logo is cute
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 6
    Very thin
  • 6
    Scalable
Cons
  • 0
    Student

What are some alternatives to Cherokee, Jetty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase