Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Capistrano vs Jenkins: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare Capistrano and Jenkins, two popular tools used in the software development and deployment processes. Both Capistrano and Jenkins are widely used in the industry for automating and streamlining various tasks, but they have some key differences that set them apart from each other. Let's explore these differences in detail.
Deployment Process: Capistrano is primarily used for deploying applications to one or more servers. It provides a convenient and automated way to deploy code, execute tasks, and manage the environment. On the other hand, Jenkins is a continuous integration and delivery tool that focuses on automating the build, test, and deployment processes throughout the software development lifecycle.
Configuration: Capistrano uses a Ruby-based DSL (Domain Specific Language) for defining the deployment process. It allows developers to script and configure the deployment tasks in a structured and flexible manner. In contrast, Jenkins uses a web-based graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to configure various build and deployment steps using a point-and-click approach. This makes Jenkins more accessible to non-technical users who don't have expertise in scripting or programming.
Automation: Capistrano is designed to automate the deployment process, enabling developers to execute complex deployment tasks with a single command. It provides a higher level of control and flexibility over the deployment process, allowing the execution of custom scripts and tasks. Jenkins, on the other hand, focuses on automating the entire software development and deployment pipeline. It can be configured to automatically trigger builds, run tests, and deploy code whenever changes are pushed to the repository. This makes Jenkins more suitable for organizations looking for continuous integration and delivery.
Plugins and Integrations: Jenkins has a vast ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality and allow integration with various tools and services. These plugins provide support for source control systems, build tools, testing frameworks, deployment platforms, and more. Capistrano, on the other hand, has a more focused set of features and integrations, mainly focusing on deploying Ruby-based applications. While Capistrano can be extended through custom scripts and tasks, it may require more manual effort compared to Jenkins plugins.
Scalability and Flexibility: Capistrano is well-suited for small to medium-sized deployments, where the number of servers and complexity of the deployment process is relatively low. It provides a straightforward and lightweight solution for deploying applications. Jenkins, on the other hand, is highly scalable and can handle large-scale deployments and complex build pipelines. It can be configured to distribute build and deployment tasks across multiple agents and provides more advanced features like parallel builds, distributed builds, and master/slave architecture.
User Roles and Permissions: Capistrano does not have built-in support for user roles and permissions. It relies on the underlying server architecture and user management system for controlling access to the deployment process. Jenkins, on the other hand, provides a robust user management system with support for defining roles and permissions at a granular level. This allows organizations to control who can perform specific actions like triggering builds, deploying code, and managing pipeline configurations.
In summary, Capistrano and Jenkins are both powerful tools used in software development and deployment. Capistrano focuses on automating the deployment process and provides flexibility and control over the tasks, while Jenkins is a comprehensive continuous integration and delivery tool that automates the entire software development pipeline. Depending on the specific requirements and needs of the project, teams can choose the tool that best suits their deployment and automation needs.
We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.
If your source code is on GitHub, also take a look at Github actions. https://github.com/features/actions
I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.
Google cloud build can help you. It is hosted on cloud and also provide reasonable free quota.
I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !
I would definetly recommend Concourse to you, as it is one of the most advanced modern methods of making CI/CD while Jenkins is an old monolithic dinosaur. Concourse itself is cloudnative and containerbased which helps you to build simple, high-performance and scalable CI/CD pipelines. In my opinion, the only lack of skills you have with Concourse is your own knowledge of how to build pipelines and automate things. Technincally there is no lack, i would even say you can extend it way more easily. But as a Con it is more easy to interact with Jenkins if you are only used to UIs. Concourse needs someone which is capable of using CLIs.
From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"
We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.
As the maintainer of the Karate DSL open-source project - I found Travis CI very easy to integrate into the GitHub workflow and it has been steady sailing for more than 2 years now ! It works well for Java / Apache Maven projects and we were able to configure it to use the latest Oracle JDK as per our needs. Thanks to the Travis CI team for this service to the open-source community !
I use Google Cloud Build because it's my first foray into the CICD world(loving it so far), and I wanted to work with something GCP native to avoid giving permissions to other SaaS tools like CircleCI and Travis CI.
I really like it because it's free for the first 120 minutes, and it's one of the few CICD tools that enterprises are open to using since it's contained within GCP.
One of the unique things is that it has the Kaniko cache, which speeds up builds by creating intermediate layers within the docker image vs. pushing the full thing from the start. Helpful when you're installing just a few additional dependencies.
Feel free to checkout an example: Cloudbuild Example
I use Travis CI because of various reasons - 1. Cloud based system so no dedicated server required, and you do not need to administrate it. 2. Easy YAML configuration. 3. Supports Major Programming Languages. 4. Support of build matrix 6. Supports AWS, Azure, Docker, Heroku, Google Cloud, Github Pages, PyPi and lot more. 7. Slack Notifications.
You are probably looking at another hosted solution: Jenkins is a good tool but it way too work intensive to be used as just a backup solution.
I have good experience with Circle-CI, Codeship, Drone.io and Travis (as well as problematic experiences with all of them), but my go-to tool is Gitlab CI: simple, powerful and if you have problems with their limitations or pricing, you can always install runners somewhere and use Gitlab just for scheduling and management. Even if you don't host your git repository at Gitlab, you can have Gitlab pull changes automatically from wherever you repo lives.
If you are considering Jenkins I would recommend at least checking out Buildkite. The agents are self-hosted (like Jenkins) but the interface is hosted for you. It meshes up some of the things I like about hosted services (pipeline definitions in YAML, managed interface and authentication) with things I like about Jenkins (local customizable agent images, secrets only on own instances, custom agent level scripts, sizing instances to your needs).
Within our deployment pipeline, we have a need to deploy to multiple customer environments, and manage secrets specifically in a way that integrates well with AWS, Kubernetes Secrets, Terraform and our pipelines ourselves.
Jenkins offered us the ability to choose one of a number of credentials/secrets management approaches, and models secrets as a more dynamic concept that GitHub Actions provided.
Additionally, we are operating Jenkins within our development Kubernetes cluster as a kind of system-wide orchestrator, allowing us to use Kubernetes pods as build agents, avoiding the ongoing direct costs associated with GitHub Actions minutes / per-user pricing. Obviously as a consequence we take on the indirect costs of maintain Jenkins itself, patching it, upgrading etc. However our experience with managing Jenkins via Kubernetes and declarative Jenkins configuration has led us to believe that this cost is small, particularly as the majority of actual building and testing is handled inside docker containers and Kubernetes, alleviating the need for less supported plugins that may make Jenkins administration more difficult.
Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.
CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.
And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.
Pros of Capistrano
- Automated deployment with several custom recipes121
- Simple63
- Ruby23
- Release-folders with symlinks11
- Multistage deployment9
- Cryptic syntax2
- Integrated rollback2
- Supports aws1
Pros of Jenkins
- Hosted internally523
- Free open source469
- Great to build, deploy or launch anything async318
- Tons of integrations243
- Rich set of plugins with good documentation211
- Has support for build pipelines111
- Easy setup68
- It is open-source66
- Workflow plugin53
- Configuration as code13
- Very powerful tool12
- Many Plugins11
- Continuous Integration10
- Great flexibility10
- Git and Maven integration is better9
- 100% free and open source8
- Slack Integration (plugin)7
- Github integration7
- Self-hosted GitLab Integration (plugin)6
- Easy customisation6
- Pipeline API5
- Docker support5
- Fast builds4
- Hosted Externally4
- Excellent docker integration4
- Platform idnependency4
- AWS Integration3
- JOBDSL3
- It's Everywhere3
- Customizable3
- Can be run as a Docker container3
- It`w worked3
- Loose Coupling2
- NodeJS Support2
- Build PR Branch Only2
- Easily extendable with seamless integration2
- PHP Support2
- Ruby/Rails Support2
- Universal controller2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Capistrano
Cons of Jenkins
- Workarounds needed for basic requirements13
- Groovy with cumbersome syntax10
- Plugins compatibility issues8
- Lack of support7
- Limited abilities with declarative pipelines7
- No YAML syntax5
- Too tied to plugins versions4
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Capistrano?
What is Jenkins?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Capistrano?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Jenkins?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+7
+4
+7
+4
+17
+22
+42
+37