StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CakePHP vs Materialize

CakePHP vs Materialize

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K
Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K

CakePHP vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Developers describe CakePHP as "The Rapid Development Framework for PHP". CakePHP makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system. On the other hand, Materialize is detailed as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design.

CakePHP belongs to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack, while Materialize can be primarily classified under "Front-End Frameworks".

"Open source" is the primary reason why developers consider CakePHP over the competitors, whereas "Google material design" was stated as the key factor in picking Materialize.

CakePHP and Materialize are both open source tools. Materialize with 36.1K GitHub stars and 4.8K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than CakePHP with 7.9K GitHub stars and 3.4K GitHub forks.

The3ballsoft, GeoLytix, and Avhana Health are some of the popular companies that use Materialize, whereas CakePHP is used by Swat.io, Walls.io, and Zumba. Materialize has a broader approval, being mentioned in 46 company stacks & 56 developers stacks; compared to CakePHP, which is listed in 66 company stacks and 29 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP
CakePHP
Materialize
Materialize

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
672
Stacks
698
Followers
401
Followers
1.2K
Votes
137
Votes
557
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Materialize?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase