StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CakePHP vs Material Design for Bootstrap

CakePHP vs Material Design for Bootstrap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K
Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap
Stacks78
Followers206
Votes46
GitHub Stars65
Forks42

CakePHP vs Material Design for Bootstrap: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Ease of Use: CakePHP is a PHP framework that aims to make development faster and simpler by providing various built-in features such as ORM, scaffolding, and code generation. On the other hand, Material Design for Bootstrap is a front-end framework that combines Google's Material Design with Bootstrap components to enhance the overall look and feel of web applications. While CakePHP focuses more on backend development, Material Design for Bootstrap primarily deals with front-end design and user interface.

  2. Technology Stack: CakePHP is based on the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, providing a structured way to separate logic from presentation. Material Design for Bootstrap, on the other hand, is a combination of Google's Material Design guidelines with Bootstrap's responsive grid system and components. This results in a robust framework that offers a wide range of design options and flexibility for creating modern web interfaces.

  3. Community Support: CakePHP has a strong community of developers who actively contribute to the framework's growth and provide support through forums, documentation, and tutorials. Material Design for Bootstrap also has a dedicated community that offers resources, templates, and updates to help users implement Material Design principles in their projects. Both frameworks benefit from community collaboration, but their focus areas differ, with CakePHP emphasizing backend functionality while Material Design for Bootstrap focuses on front-end design elements.

  4. Customization Options: CakePHP allows developers to create customized applications using its flexible architecture and extensive libraries. While Material Design for Bootstrap provides pre-designed components and templates based on Google's Material Design principles, offering a quick way to implement visually appealing elements in web projects. Developers can choose between the two frameworks based on their specific customization needs and project requirements.

  5. Learning Curve: CakePHP requires a certain level of familiarity with PHP and the MVC architecture to efficiently develop applications using the framework. Material Design for Bootstrap, on the other hand, simplifies the design process by providing ready-to-use components and guidelines following Google's Material Design language. This results in a quicker learning curve for developers who want to create aesthetically pleasing interfaces without diving deep into backend logic and coding.

In Summary, CakePHP and Material Design for Bootstrap offer distinct advantages in backend development and front-end design, respectively, catering to different aspects of web application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP
CakePHP
Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

It is an open source toolkit based on Bootstrap for developing Material Design apps with HTML, CSS, and JS. Quickly prototype your ideas or build your entire app with our Sass variables and mixins, responsive grid system, extensive prebuilt components, and powerful plugins built on jQuery.

Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
Input fields; Textarea; Buttons (ripple effect working); Select; Navbar; Button groups; Input groups; Checkbox; Radio; Alerts; Progress bars; Jumbotron; Wells; Dialogs; Lists
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Stars
65
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
42
Stacks
672
Stacks
78
Followers
401
Followers
206
Votes
137
Votes
46
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
Pros
  • 16
    Bootstrap
  • 6
    Awesome and simple to use
  • 6
    Light weight
  • 4
    Responsive
  • 4
    Google Material Design
Cons
  • 2
    Not free for premo stuff
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Material Design for Bootstrap?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase