StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Caddy vs Microsoft IIS vs nginx

Caddy vs Microsoft IIS vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
Caddy
Caddy
Stacks363
Followers282
Votes20
GitHub Stars67.7K
Forks4.5K

Caddy vs Microsoft IIS vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web servers, there are several options to choose from. Three popular web servers that are widely used are Caddy, Microsoft IIS, and nginx. While all three serve the same purpose of hosting websites, there are important differences between them that make each unique. In this article, we will explore and highlight the key differences between Caddy, Microsoft IIS, and nginx.

  1. Installation and Configuration: Caddy stands out from the rest by offering a simplified installation and configuration process. With a single command, Caddy can be installed and is ready to be used. Compared to Caddy, Microsoft IIS and nginx have relatively complex installation processes and require more manual configurations.

  2. Automatic HTTPS: Caddy by default provides automatic HTTPS encryption for websites. It comes with built-in Let's Encrypt integration, making it easy to secure websites with SSL/TLS certificates. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS and nginx require additional configuration steps to enable HTTPS and obtain SSL/TLS certificates.

  3. Ease of Use: Caddy focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It has a user-friendly interface and provides clear and concise configuration files. Microsoft IIS, although it has improved over the years, still retains some complexity in its configuration settings. nginx, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive range of configuration options.

  4. Platform Support: Microsoft IIS is specifically designed for the Windows operating system and integrates well with other Microsoft products. Caddy, on the other hand, is cross-platform and can run on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. nginx, being highly versatile, can also run on various platforms, including Windows and Unix-like systems.

  5. Performance: Caddy is known for its efficient resource utilization and high performance. It is designed to be lightweight and fast. Microsoft IIS and nginx, both being mature and widely-used web servers, also offer good performance but may require additional optimizations for specific scenarios.

  6. Module Ecosystem: nginx has a vast and active module ecosystem that provides a wide range of features and functionalities. It offers extensive options for customization and can be tailored to suit specific needs. Caddy, while relatively newer, has a growing module ecosystem. Microsoft IIS, however, has a smaller module ecosystem compared to both Caddy and nginx.

In Summary, Caddy stands out with its simplified installation and configuration process, automatic HTTPS, ease of use, cross-platform support, and good performance. It also has a growing module ecosystem. Microsoft IIS has tighter integration with Windows and provides good performance. nginx is known for its extensive module ecosystem, versatility, and high performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Microsoft IIS, Caddy

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Grant
Grant

Developer at GMS LLC

Sep 5, 2020

Decided
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
429k views429k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Caddy
Caddy

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

--
Static file server; Reverse proxy; Load balancing; Automatic HTTPS; TLS by default; Caddyfile; Config API; Config adapters; HTTP/1.1; HTTP/2; HTTP/3; Virtual hosting; TLS ceritificate auto-renew; Extensible; No dependencies; Fewer moving parts
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
67.7K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.5K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
363
Followers
61.9K
Followers
7.7K
Followers
282
Votes
5.5K
Votes
236
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 6
    Sane config file syntax
  • 6
    Easy HTTP/2 Server Push
  • 4
    Builtin HTTPS
  • 2
    Letsencrypt support
  • 2
    Runtime config API
Cons
  • 3
    New kid

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Microsoft IIS, Caddy?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Cowboy

Cowboy

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase