StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Charting Libraries
  5. C3.js vs Vue.js

C3.js vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C3.js
C3.js
Stacks398
Followers163
Votes4
Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K

C3.js vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between C3.js and Vue.js, specifically 6 distinct differences.

  1. Scalability: C3.js is primarily focused on data visualization, providing numerous chart types and customization options. It excels in handling large datasets and rendering complex visualizations with high performance. On the other hand, Vue.js is a versatile JavaScript framework that enables building full-featured web applications. It offers a component-based structure and advanced features for state management, making it suitable for scalable and interactive applications beyond just data visualization.

  2. Learning Curve: C3.js is relatively easier to learn and use, especially for those familiar with D3.js, as it is built on top of it. Its syntax is straightforward and well-documented, making it accessible for beginners in data visualization. Conversely, Vue.js has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive ecosystem and advanced concepts like directives, components, and reactive data binding. It may take more time to grasp Vue.js as compared to C3.js.

  3. Community Support: Both C3.js and Vue.js have strong communities backing them. However, Vue.js, being a widely adopted JavaScript framework, enjoys a larger and more active community. It results in extensive resources, a broad range of plugins, and vibrant discussion forums, making it easier to find help, share knowledge, and collaborate with fellow developers on Vue.js projects. C3.js, although well-supported, may have comparatively fewer resources available due to its more specialized nature.

  4. Integration: C3.js is designed to seamlessly integrate charting capabilities into existing web applications. It provides an easy-to-use API and integrates well with other JavaScript libraries and frameworks. It can be added as a standalone library or incorporated into a larger project. In contrast, Vue.js is a complete frontend framework. It encompasses all the necessary tools and features to develop complex applications, including charting capabilities if required. Vue.js provides a clean integration of charts or other third-party libraries, as it allows for custom components to be easily created and managed within Vue.js applications.

  5. Data Handling: C3.js is optimized for working with structured data and offers numerous options to transform, aggregate, and analyze datasets before visualizing them. It provides built-in functions to handle data manipulation and transformation. On the other side, Vue.js focuses more on data binding and state management within its reactive system. It excels in handling dynamic and real-time data, making it a suitable choice for applications where data mutability and bidirectional bindings are crucial.

  6. Project Scope: C3.js is primarily designed for adding charts and visualizations to web pages or specific sections of an application. It provides a wide range of chart types and customization options, making it ideal for projects that primarily require data visualization capabilities. In contrast, Vue.js is a comprehensive JavaScript framework that covers a broader scope of web application development. While Vue.js can be used for building standalone charts, its versatility extends to developing complex and interactive applications with seamless integration of different components and features.

Summary

In summary, C3.js is a specialized library focusing on data visualization with scalability and ease of use, while Vue.js is a versatile JavaScript framework with a steeper learning curve but broader scope and stronger community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C3.js, Vue.js

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C3.js
C3.js
Vue.js
Vue.js

c3 is a D3-based reusable chart library that enables deeper integration of charts into web applications.

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Comfortable - C3 makes it easy to generate D3-based charts by wrapping the code required to construct the entire chart. We don't need to write D3 code any more.;Customizable - C3 gives some classes to each element when generating, so you can define a custom style by the class and it's possible to extend the structure directly by D3.;Controllable - C3 provides a variety of APIs and callbacks to access the state of the chart. By using them, you can update the chart even if after it's rendered.
Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
33.8K
Stacks
398
Stacks
55.5K
Followers
163
Followers
44.7K
Votes
4
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Reusable charts
  • 2
    Easy to use
Cons
  • 1
    Dependent on D3.js which is not lightweight
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
Integrations
D3.js
D3.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to C3.js, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

D3.js

D3.js

It is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. Emphasises on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase