StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

Β© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Buildbot vs Gitea

Buildbot vs Gitea

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buildbot
Buildbot
Stacks73
Followers128
Votes27
GitHub Stars5.4K
Forks1.7K
Gitea
Gitea
Stacks323
Followers448
Votes123
GitHub Stars51.8K
Forks6.2K

Buildbot vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

Buildbot and Gitea are popular tools used in software development processes. While they both serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare the main differences between Buildbot and Gitea.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: Buildbot primarily focuses on continuous integration and automation, providing support for different version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. On the other hand, Gitea is a lightweight and self-hosted Git service that offers full-fledged repository management capabilities.

  2. User Interface and Ease of Use: Gitea provides a streamlined and user-friendly web interface for managing repositories, issues, and collaboration features. It offers an intuitive experience for both developers and non-technical users. Buildbot, however, focuses more on automation and doesn't provide extensive user interface features for repository management.

  3. Deployment and Scalability: Buildbot is designed to be easily scalable, allowing the setup of distributed build systems with multiple builders, workers, and schedulers. Gitea, on the other hand, is primarily focused on managing individual repositories and doesn't provide robust options for distributed build systems.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Gitea has a thriving community with a wide range of plugins and integrations available. It benefits from the larger Git ecosystem and has extensive documentation and community support. Buildbot, although it has an active community, may have a relatively smaller ecosystem in comparison.

  5. Extensibility and customization: Buildbot offers extensive flexibility for customization and integration with third-party tools through its powerful build configuration system. Users can define complex build pipelines and workflows tailored to their specific requirements. Gitea, while it provides some extensibility options, focuses more on providing a unified user experience for Git repository management.

  6. Build and Test Automation: Buildbot specializes in build and test automation, providing features like continuous integration, distributed builds, and build status monitoring. While Gitea has basic features for build automation, it is not its primary focus, and it may be lacking in some of the advanced automation capabilities provided by Buildbot.

In summary, Buildbot and Gitea have key differences in terms of their integration with version control systems, user interface and ease of use, deployment and scalability, community and ecosystem, extensibility and customization, and focus on build automation. These factors should be considered based on specific requirements and preferences when choosing between the two tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Buildbot, Gitea

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k
Comments
Sri Srinivas
Sri Srinivas

Feb 11, 2020

Needs advice

I want to start automatic regressions for nightly builds and also continuous integration builds. The tests I ran are part of my regression suite. And I want to track the results of these tests.

I am able to do this with Jenkins using the Junit plugin. But, I am trying to do the same with Buildbot, and I am not able to get the report of the tests. So, I just want to know is it possible to get the reporting of tests through Buildbot. If yes, could anyone provide some examples

121k views121k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buildbot
Buildbot
Gitea
Gitea

BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure.

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

run builds on a variety of slave platforms;arbitrary build process: handles projects using C, Python, whatever;minimal host requirements: Python and Twisted;slaves can be behind a firewall if they can still do checkout;status delivery through web page, email, IRC, other protocols;track builds in progress, provide estimated completion time;flexible configuration by subclassing generic build process classes;debug tools to force a new build, submit fake Changes, query slave status;released under the GPL
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.4K
GitHub Stars
51.8K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
73
Stacks
323
Followers
128
Followers
448
Votes
27
Votes
123
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Highly configurable builds
  • 5
    Hosted internally
  • 5
    Beautiful waterfall
  • 4
    Free open source
  • 3
    Python
Pros
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Multiple code maintainers
Cons
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
No integrations available
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi
DingTalk
DingTalk
Discord
Discord
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Vagrant
Vagrant
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Buildbot, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana