Boxfuse vs Docker: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code highlights key differences between Boxfuse and Docker.

1. **Minimum Footprint**: Boxfuse is designed to provide the smallest possible footprint for deploying applications, focusing on simplicity and lightweight instances, making it ideal for microservices and quick deployment scenarios. On the other hand, Docker provides a more robust and feature-rich platform for containerization, offering a wide array of tools and functionalities but resulting in a larger footprint compared to Boxfuse.

2. **Automated Provisioning**: Boxfuse offers seamless and highly automated provisioning processes, reducing the need for manual intervention in deployment workflows. In contrast, Docker requires more hands-on configuration and management, especially for complex setups and larger container clusters, making it less automated in comparison to Boxfuse.

3. **Instance Management**: Boxfuse simplifies instance management by providing a streamlined approach that abstracts away much of the complexity involved in handling individual instances, making it easier for developers to focus on their applications. Docker, on the other hand, gives users more control and flexibility over individual containers and instances, providing finer-grained management options that can be advantageous in certain scenarios.

4. **Integration with Cloud Providers**: Boxfuse has built-in native integration with leading cloud providers, such as AWS and GCP, allowing for seamless deployment of applications across different cloud environments. In contrast, while Docker can be integrated with various cloud platforms through plugins and services, it may require more manual configuration and setup compared to Boxfuse's native integrations.

5. **Versioning and Rollbacks**: Boxfuse simplifies the process of versioning and rollback of deployments, offering built-in mechanisms to easily revert to previous versions in case of issues or failures. Docker provides similar capabilities, but the setup and implementation of versioning and rollbacks may require more manual configuration and scripting compared to the streamlined approach offered by Boxfuse.

6. **Lifecycle Management**: Boxfuse focuses on streamlining the entire lifecycle management of applications, from development to deployment, by providing a cohesive and integrated platform. While Docker covers the entire application lifecycle as well, it may require additional third-party tools and services to achieve the same level of end-to-end management provided by Boxfuse.

In Summary, the key differences between Boxfuse and Docker lie in their approach to footprint, automation, instance management, integration with cloud providers, versioning and rollbacks, and overall lifecycle management.