Blitz vs Locust

Overview

Blitz

Stacks43

Followers41

Votes2

Locust

Stacks191

Followers317

Votes51

GitHub Stars27.0K

Forks3.1K

Blitz vs Locust: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Blitz uses its own in-house built language called HTML++ for scripting load tests, while Locust allows users to write test scenarios in Python, which can be more versatile and familiar to Python developers.
User Interface: Blitz provides a user-friendly web interface for creating and running load tests, making it easier for non-technical users to set up tests. In contrast, Locust is designed to be more developer-centric, with a focus on writing test scripts using Python code.
Scalability: Blitz offers a cloud infrastructure that automatically scales up resources based on the load test requirements, allowing for testing with a high number of virtual users. On the other hand, Locust requires users to manage their own infrastructure, which may limit the scalability of load tests.
Community Support: Locust has a large and active open-source community that contributes to its development and provides support to users. In comparison, Blitz being a commercial product, has a limited community support system, with most support coming from the Blitz team.
Customization: Locust allows users to customize their load testing scenarios in detail by writing Python code, offering more flexibility and control over the testing process. Blitz, while providing a user-friendly interface, may restrict the level of customization available to users who prefer more advanced scripting options.

In Summary, Blitz and Locust differ in their programming language, user interface, scalability, community support, and customization options for load testing web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Blitz, Locust

Rashmi

Mar 17, 2021

Needs adviceon

Jenkins

Gatling

Locust

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

104k views104k

Comments

Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceon

Gatling

Locust

Flood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Blitz	Locust
Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.	Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
Complex transactions- Whether you want to test a web page or a complex transaction , Blitz makes it easy for you to determine the number of users you can support.;Detailed feedback- Get detailed statistics and feedback in real time, and in plain English;Plugins- With our extension for Chrome or add-on for Firefox , just navigating to a webpage and run a performance test. Blitz takes care of the cookies, authentication and all the other underlying complexities.;Automation- With the Ruby GEM and full integration with Continuous Integration servers like Atlassian's Bamboo CI server, automated performance testing can ensure that no code push can cause a poor experience for your users.;Remediation- Making changes to a web page, application or API can have unintended consequences. Blitz can extract information from your monitoring solution like Google Analytics®, etc. and create a load test to verify the fix.;Monitoring, and Remediation also available	Define user behaviour in code;Distributed & scalable;Proven & battle tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 27.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.1K
Stacks 43	Stacks 191
Followers 41	Followers 317
Votes 2	Votes 51
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Load testing	Pros 15 Hackable 11 Supports distributed 7 Open source 6 Easy to use 6 Easy to setup Cons 1 Bad design
Integrations
AppFog AppHarbor cloudControl CloudBees CloudFlare CopperEgg Engine Yard Cloud Heroku New Relic PagerDuty	Python

What are some alternatives to Blitz, Locust?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Soundkit

Voice agent QA for teams who can't afford broken calls, compliance gaps, or production failures. Simulate thousands of conversations, validate legal

LoadNinja

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Related Comparisons

Blitz vs Locust: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Blitz uses its own in-house built language called HTML++ for scripting load tests, while Locust allows users to write test scenarios in Python, which can be more versatile and familiar to Python developers.
User Interface: Blitz provides a user-friendly web interface for creating and running load tests, making it easier for non-technical users to set up tests. In contrast, Locust is designed to be more developer-centric, with a focus on writing test scripts using Python code.
Scalability: Blitz offers a cloud infrastructure that automatically scales up resources based on the load test requirements, allowing for testing with a high number of virtual users. On the other hand, Locust requires users to manage their own infrastructure, which may limit the scalability of load tests.
Community Support: Locust has a large and active open-source community that contributes to its development and provides support to users. In comparison, Blitz being a commercial product, has a limited community support system, with most support coming from the Blitz team.
Customization: Locust allows users to customize their load testing scenarios in detail by writing Python code, offering more flexibility and control over the testing process. Blitz, while providing a user-friendly interface, may restrict the level of customization available to users who prefer more advanced scripting options.

In Summary, Blitz and Locust differ in their programming language, user interface, scalability, community support, and customization options for load testing web applications.

Blitz vs Locust

Overview