Blazor vs Open Lowcode

Overview

Blazor

Stacks549

Followers724

Votes445

Open Lowcode

Stacks3

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars211

Forks28

Blazor vs Open Lowcode: What are the differences?

Blazor: Blazor is a Microsoft framework that allows developers to build interactive web UIs using C# instead of JavaScript. It uses WebAssembly to run .NET code directly in the browser, enabling a more efficient and familiar development experience for .NET developers. Blazor provides a full stack web development experience, allowing both client-side and server-side rendering.
Open Lowcode: Open Lowcode is an open-source platform for developing business applications. It offers a low-code approach, allowing developers to quickly build applications using pre-built components and templates. Open Lowcode focuses on providing a visual development environment, simplifying complex backend processes and reducing the amount of code needed to create applications.
Blazor vs Open Lowcode:
1. Language Support: Blazor primarily uses C# for development while Open Lowcode supports multiple languages like Java, Python, and SQL. This allows developers with different language preferences to choose the platform that best suits their needs.
2. Deployment Options: Blazor applications can be executed client-side (running directly in the browser via WebAssembly) or server-side (rendered on the server and sent to the client as HTML). Open Lowcode, on the other hand, focuses on server-side rendering and deploying applications on various cloud providers.
3. Development Experience: Blazor provides a more familiar development experience for .NET developers as it allows them to leverage their existing knowledge of C# and .NET ecosystem. Open Lowcode, on the other hand, offers a more visual development experience with a focus on low-code development, aiming to simplify and speed up the application development process.
4. Community and Support: Blazor benefits from a large and active community due to its association with Microsoft and the popularity of .NET ecosystem. Open Lowcode, being an open-source project, also has an active community, but it may not be as extensive as Blazor's community.
5. Scalability and Flexibility: Blazor provides flexibility in terms of deployment options (client-side or server-side) and can be used to build both simple and complex applications. Open Lowcode emphasizes scalability and aims to simplify the development of large and complex business applications by providing pre-built components and templates.
6. Integration and Extensibility: Blazor can be easily integrated with existing .NET libraries and frameworks, allowing developers to leverage their existing codebase. Open Lowcode focuses on integration with various databases and third-party services, offering seamless connectivity and extensibility options.

In summary, Blazor is a Microsoft framework that allows developers to build web UIs using C#, while Open Lowcode is an open-source platform focused on low-code development for business applications. The key differences between the two include language support, deployment options, development experience, community and support, scalability and flexibility, and integration and extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Blazor	Open Lowcode
Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.	It allows organizations develop quickly specific applications, and scale them with a minimum budget.
Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming	95% of your application built assembling existing bricks; Accessible to digital citizens. You do not need a developer to start; No infrastructure required. Just run the prototype on your PC; Full freedom for your developers to create the crucial power features; Add quickly access control, reports, workflows, import / export; Full open-source. Never be a captive customer again
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 211
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 28
Stacks 549	Stacks 3
Followers 724	Followers 24
Votes 445	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 63 Uses C# 49 No need to learn separate language or technology 42 Supports making a single page application 40 Tight integration with .NET project 38 Uses .NET standard library Cons 4 Initial load time 2 Hard to inject javascript	No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET C# WebAssembly	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Blazor, Open Lowcode?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Blazor vs Open Lowcode: What are the differences?

Blazor: Blazor is a Microsoft framework that allows developers to build interactive web UIs using C# instead of JavaScript. It uses WebAssembly to run .NET code directly in the browser, enabling a more efficient and familiar development experience for .NET developers. Blazor provides a full stack web development experience, allowing both client-side and server-side rendering.
Open Lowcode: Open Lowcode is an open-source platform for developing business applications. It offers a low-code approach, allowing developers to quickly build applications using pre-built components and templates. Open Lowcode focuses on providing a visual development environment, simplifying complex backend processes and reducing the amount of code needed to create applications.
Blazor vs Open Lowcode:
1. Language Support: Blazor primarily uses C# for development while Open Lowcode supports multiple languages like Java, Python, and SQL. This allows developers with different language preferences to choose the platform that best suits their needs.
2. Deployment Options: Blazor applications can be executed client-side (running directly in the browser via WebAssembly) or server-side (rendered on the server and sent to the client as HTML). Open Lowcode, on the other hand, focuses on server-side rendering and deploying applications on various cloud providers.
3. Development Experience: Blazor provides a more familiar development experience for .NET developers as it allows them to leverage their existing knowledge of C# and .NET ecosystem. Open Lowcode, on the other hand, offers a more visual development experience with a focus on low-code development, aiming to simplify and speed up the application development process.
4. Community and Support: Blazor benefits from a large and active community due to its association with Microsoft and the popularity of .NET ecosystem. Open Lowcode, being an open-source project, also has an active community, but it may not be as extensive as Blazor's community.
5. Scalability and Flexibility: Blazor provides flexibility in terms of deployment options (client-side or server-side) and can be used to build both simple and complex applications. Open Lowcode emphasizes scalability and aims to simplify the development of large and complex business applications by providing pre-built components and templates.
6. Integration and Extensibility: Blazor can be easily integrated with existing .NET libraries and frameworks, allowing developers to leverage their existing codebase. Open Lowcode focuses on integration with various databases and third-party services, offering seamless connectivity and extensibility options.

Blazor vs Open Lowcode

Overview