Black Duck vs Snyk

Overview

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

Black Duck

Stacks47

Followers122

Votes0

Black Duck vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction

Black Duck and Snyk are both popular software composition analysis (SCA) tools used to identify and manage open source security and license compliance risks in software development projects. While both tools serve similar purposes, there are key differences between Black Duck and Snyk that can impact the choice of tool for organizations. The following are the six key differences between Black Duck and Snyk:

Integration: Black Duck provides integrations with a wide range of development tools such as IDEs, build systems, and issue trackers, allowing seamless integration into existing software development workflows. On the other hand, Snyk focuses on providing integrations with popular development platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, enabling developers to easily scan and fix vulnerabilities within their repositories.
Approach to vulnerability identification: Black Duck primarily relies on a signature-based approach to identify known vulnerabilities in open source components. It maintains a comprehensive vulnerability database and matches component signatures to identify any security vulnerabilities. In contrast, Snyk utilizes a unique approach called "fingerprinting" which involves analyzing the behavior and dependencies of the components to detect vulnerabilities, even for those without known signatures.
Continuous monitoring: Black Duck offers continuous monitoring capabilities, allowing organizations to track the security posture of their applications throughout the software development lifecycle. It provides real-time alerts and reports on new vulnerabilities and license compliance issues. Snyk also offers continuous monitoring but focuses more on providing real-time vulnerability alerts and automatic fixes for open source dependencies within code repositories.
Developer-centricity: Snyk emphasizes a developer-centric approach by integrating security testing directly into the developer's workflow. It offers CLI (command-line interface) and IDE plugins that enable developers to scan their code for vulnerabilities and receive remediation advice on the go. Black Duck, although it provides developer-friendly integrations, is commonly used by security teams and compliance officers for tracking and managing open source risks.
Language and ecosystem support: Black Duck has broad language support for scanning and analyzing code written in multiple programming languages. It also covers a wide range of software ecosystems including mobile, web development, and IoT (Internet of Things). Snyk, while it also offers support for multiple languages, has particularly strong support for JavaScript-based technologies and frameworks, making it a popular choice for projects heavily reliant on Node.js and JavaScript ecosystems.
License compliance management: Black Duck's focus extends beyond security vulnerabilities to include comprehensive license compliance management. It offers features like software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, license risk analysis, and policy enforcement to ensure compliance with open source licenses. In comparison, Snyk primarily focuses on security vulnerabilities and provides limited license management capabilities, such as identifying licenses and their associated risks.

In summary, Black Duck and Snyk differ in terms of integration options, vulnerability identification approaches, continuous monitoring capabilities, target audience, language and ecosystem support, and license compliance management. These differences should be considered when selecting an SCA tool based on specific project requirements and organizational needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Snyk, Black Duck

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk	Black Duck
Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform	It is a solution that helps development teams manage risks that come with the use of open source. It gives you complete visibility into open source management, combining sophisticated, multi-factor open source detection capabilities with the Black Duck KnowledgeBase.
-	License management; PDF protection; Trial license; Binary separation; Asset tracking; Audit management; Open source security; Open source compliance.
Statistics
Stacks 580	Stacks 47
Followers 380	Followers 122
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java	Apache Ant Travis CI Gradle Bitbucket Apache Maven Bamboo Appveyor

What are some alternatives to Snyk, Black Duck?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Black Duck vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration: Black Duck provides integrations with a wide range of development tools such as IDEs, build systems, and issue trackers, allowing seamless integration into existing software development workflows. On the other hand, Snyk focuses on providing integrations with popular development platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, enabling developers to easily scan and fix vulnerabilities within their repositories.
Approach to vulnerability identification: Black Duck primarily relies on a signature-based approach to identify known vulnerabilities in open source components. It maintains a comprehensive vulnerability database and matches component signatures to identify any security vulnerabilities. In contrast, Snyk utilizes a unique approach called "fingerprinting" which involves analyzing the behavior and dependencies of the components to detect vulnerabilities, even for those without known signatures.
Continuous monitoring: Black Duck offers continuous monitoring capabilities, allowing organizations to track the security posture of their applications throughout the software development lifecycle. It provides real-time alerts and reports on new vulnerabilities and license compliance issues. Snyk also offers continuous monitoring but focuses more on providing real-time vulnerability alerts and automatic fixes for open source dependencies within code repositories.
Developer-centricity: Snyk emphasizes a developer-centric approach by integrating security testing directly into the developer's workflow. It offers CLI (command-line interface) and IDE plugins that enable developers to scan their code for vulnerabilities and receive remediation advice on the go. Black Duck, although it provides developer-friendly integrations, is commonly used by security teams and compliance officers for tracking and managing open source risks.
Language and ecosystem support: Black Duck has broad language support for scanning and analyzing code written in multiple programming languages. It also covers a wide range of software ecosystems including mobile, web development, and IoT (Internet of Things). Snyk, while it also offers support for multiple languages, has particularly strong support for JavaScript-based technologies and frameworks, making it a popular choice for projects heavily reliant on Node.js and JavaScript ecosystems.
License compliance management: Black Duck's focus extends beyond security vulnerabilities to include comprehensive license compliance management. It offers features like software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, license risk analysis, and policy enforcement to ensure compliance with open source licenses. In comparison, Snyk primarily focuses on security vulnerabilities and provides limited license management capabilities, such as identifying licenses and their associated risks.

Black Duck vs Snyk

Overview

Black Duck vs Snyk: What are the differences?