BEM vs Foundation

Overview

Foundation

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.2K

Votes740

BEM

Stacks118

Followers98

Votes0

BEM vs Foundation: What are the differences?

BEM (Block Element Modifier) and Foundation are two popular front-end development methodologies and frameworks used to build responsive and maintainable websites.

Naming Convention: BEM uses a naming convention that helps developers better understand the structure of the code by naming blocks, elements, and modifiers. Foundation, on the other hand, provides a flexible framework with pre-styled components and utilities that simplify building responsive websites.
Modularity: BEM emphasizes modularity by breaking down components into blocks, elements, and modifiers, promoting reusability and a more organized codebase. Foundation offers pre-built modules and components that can be easily integrated into a project without the need for extensive customization.
Flexibility: Foundation provides a more flexible approach to styling and layout, allowing developers to customize the framework to suit their specific design needs. BEM, on the other hand, focuses on maintaining a consistent naming convention and structure throughout the codebase, which can sometimes limit flexibility.
Community Support: BEM has a strong community of developers who advocate for its benefits and best practices, making it easier for new developers to learn and adopt the methodology. Foundation, being a widely-used framework, has a larger community with extensive documentation and resources for developers to access.
Design Patterns: BEM follows a specific design pattern that promotes consistency and predictability in the codebase, making it easier to collaborate with other developers and maintain code quality. Foundation, while providing a solid foundation for building websites, may require additional effort to enforce consistent design patterns and coding standards across projects.

In Summary, BEM focuses on modularity and maintainability through a strict naming convention, while Foundation offers flexibility and pre-styled components for building responsive websites.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Foundation	BEM
Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.	This methodology was developed at Yandex with the goals in mind that Fast development and long-lasting results for standard projects,A project involves many people,Scalable teams,Code reuse.
Semantic: Everything is semantic. You can have the cleanest markup without sacrificing the utility and speed of Foundation.;Mobile First: You can build for small devices first. Then, as devices get larger and larger, layer in more complexity for a complete responsive design.;Customizable: You can customize your build to include or remove certain elements, as well as define the size of columns, colors, font size and more.;Professional: Millions of designers and developers depend on Foundation. Now we have business support, training and consulting to help grow your product or service.	-
Statistics
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 118
Followers 1.2K	Followers 98
Votes 740	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 160 Responsive grid 93 Mobile first 80 Open source 75 Semantic 72 Customizable Cons 5 Requires jQuery 4 Awful site	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Foundation, BEM?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

BEM vs Foundation: What are the differences?

BEM (Block Element Modifier) and Foundation are two popular front-end development methodologies and frameworks used to build responsive and maintainable websites.

Naming Convention: BEM uses a naming convention that helps developers better understand the structure of the code by naming blocks, elements, and modifiers. Foundation, on the other hand, provides a flexible framework with pre-styled components and utilities that simplify building responsive websites.
Modularity: BEM emphasizes modularity by breaking down components into blocks, elements, and modifiers, promoting reusability and a more organized codebase. Foundation offers pre-built modules and components that can be easily integrated into a project without the need for extensive customization.
Flexibility: Foundation provides a more flexible approach to styling and layout, allowing developers to customize the framework to suit their specific design needs. BEM, on the other hand, focuses on maintaining a consistent naming convention and structure throughout the codebase, which can sometimes limit flexibility.
Community Support: BEM has a strong community of developers who advocate for its benefits and best practices, making it easier for new developers to learn and adopt the methodology. Foundation, being a widely-used framework, has a larger community with extensive documentation and resources for developers to access.
Design Patterns: BEM follows a specific design pattern that promotes consistency and predictability in the codebase, making it easier to collaborate with other developers and maintain code quality. Foundation, while providing a solid foundation for building websites, may require additional effort to enforce consistent design patterns and coding standards across projects.

In Summary, BEM focuses on modularity and maintainability through a strict naming convention, while Foundation offers flexibility and pre-styled components for building responsive websites.