Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bazel vs Docker: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Bazel and Docker are both powerful tools used in software development and deployment. However, they have key differences in their functionalities and purposes. In this article, we will explore the differences between Bazel and Docker in detail.
Build Process: Bazel is primarily a build automation tool that focuses on creating reproducible and efficient builds. It uses a build graph to determine the dependencies and parallelizes the build process. On the other hand, Docker is a platform that allows developers to package their applications and dependencies into portable containers.
Isolation: Bazel provides isolation at a fine-grained level by implementing sandboxing techniques. It ensures that the build process does not have any external dependencies or side effects. Docker, on the other hand, provides a more heavyweight form of isolation by using containerization. It encapsulates an entire environment, including the application and its dependencies.
Portability: Bazel is designed to be highly portable and platform-agnostic. It can build software for various platforms and architectures without any modifications to the build configuration. Docker, on the other hand, provides a consistent execution environment by abstracting away the underlying operating system and hardware, making it easier to run applications across different platforms.
Reproducibility: Bazel emphasizes reproducibility by ensuring that the build process is hermetic and deterministic. It uses content hashing to verify that the build inputs are unchanged and produces the same outputs consistently. Docker focuses more on providing a consistent runtime environment, but it may not guarantee the exact same outputs for a given input in different environments.
Dependency Management: Bazel has sophisticated dependency management capabilities built-in. It can resolve and fetch dependencies from various sources efficiently, allowing for incremental builds. Docker, on the other hand, relies on package managers and container registries to manage dependencies within containers.
Resource Utilization: Bazel optimizes resource utilization by caching build artifacts and only rebuilding what is necessary. It can skip the build process for unchanged dependencies, resulting in faster build times. Docker, however, may require building the entire container from scratch whenever there is a change, leading to potentially longer build times.
In summary, Bazel focuses on efficient and reproducible builds with fine-grained isolation and dependency management, while Docker provides encapsulation of applications and their dependencies for easy deployment and portability.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Bazel
- Fast28
- Deterministic incremental builds20
- Correct17
- Multi-language16
- Enforces declared inputs/outputs14
- High-level build language10
- Scalable9
- Multi-platform support5
- Sandboxing5
- Dependency management4
- Windows Support2
- Flexible2
- Android Studio integration1
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bazel
- No Windows Support3
- Bad IntelliJ support2
- Poor windows support for some languages1
- Constant breaking changes1
- Learning Curve1
- Lack of Documentation1
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3