StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Backendless vs Fanout

Backendless vs Fanout

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fanout
Fanout
Stacks6
Followers33
Votes0
Backendless
Backendless
Stacks16
Followers74
Votes0

Backendless vs Fanout: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Scalability: One key difference between Backendless and Fanout is the scalability factor. Backendless provides auto-scaling capabilities to handle varying workloads efficiently, whereas Fanout is primarily focused on real-time messaging and may not offer the same level of scalability for complex applications.
  2. Data Storage: Backendless offers a fully-integrated backend-as-a-service platform with features like data storage, user management, and API services, while Fanout specializes in real-time data push and does not provide comprehensive backend services like data storage or user authentication.
  3. Real-time Messaging: Fanout excels in real-time messaging and offers WebSocket-based solutions to enable instant updates and notifications to clients, while Backendless may not provide the same level of real-time messaging capabilities out of the box.
  4. Extensibility: Backendless allows for custom business logic implementation through Codeless logic or custom API services, providing a high level of extensibility for developers, while Fanout is more focused on real-time message distribution and may have limited options for extending functionality.
  5. Integration Support: Backendless offers seamless integration with popular third-party services and APIs, making it easier to connect and extend functionality, whereas Fanout may have limited integration support and may require more custom development for integrating with other services.
  6. Pricing Model: Backendless follows a comprehensive pricing model based on usage, features, and scaling requirements, while Fanout may have a more simplified pricing structure focused on real-time messaging usage.
In Summary, Backendless provides a complete backend solution with scalability, data storage, and extensibility options, while Fanout specializes in real-time messaging services and may lack comprehensive backend features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fanout
Fanout
Backendless
Backendless

Fanout makes it easy to build realtime APIs and apps. The product is a cross between a reverse proxy and a message broker. Receivers subscribe to channels, and published data is delivered in realtime.

It is a development and runtime platform which simplifies and shortens mobile application development process. The platform removes the need to develop backend functionality by providing reusable server-side services via APIs. The APIs are packaged into native libraries available for all major client-side environments - Andoid, iOS, JavaScript, .NET, ActionScript and REST. The default backend logic can be modified with custom server-side code. The platform is available as an online service and a downloadable Enterprise product which can be deployed in any environment.

Reverse proxy -- integrate realtime with any level of your technology stack, not just your front end.;Interoperable -- Add realtime to any API, no matter your backend or database, without changing any of your existing API contracts.;Open -- cloud or self hosted, it’s up to you. We don’t believe in vendor lock-in.
Provides intuitive APIs for handling user registration, login and session management; Supports object persistence with complex hierarchies; Delivers push notifications to iOS, Android and Windows Phone devices; Handles publish subscribe message routing; Performs ultra fast geo queries; Generates client-side code to get developers to start coding faster; Backend logic can be modified with custom code; Includes in-depth analytics; Allows to export and import data;
Statistics
Stacks
6
Stacks
16
Followers
33
Followers
74
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Fanout, Backendless?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase