Azure Search vs Google Maps

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Search

79
219
+ 1
16
Google Maps

40.5K
28.1K
+ 1
566
Add tool

Azure Search vs Google Maps: What are the differences?

Introduction

Welcome to this comparison between Azure Search and Google Maps. In this article, we will explore the key differences between these two popular services.

  1. Pricing Model: One key difference between Azure Search and Google Maps is their pricing models. Azure Search offers a usage-based pricing model, where you pay based on the number of document executions and the data storage used. On the other hand, Google Maps pricing is based on monthly active users (MAUs) and the usage of additional features like routes, geocoding, and places.

  2. Primary Functionality: Azure Search is primarily designed as a search service, allowing developers to easily incorporate search functionality into their applications. It provides features like full-text search, filtering, sorting, and faceting. On the other hand, Google Maps focuses on providing mapping and location-based services, including displaying maps, geocoding addresses, calculating routes, and displaying points of interest.

  3. APIs and SDKs: Azure Search offers rich APIs and SDKs for developing applications. It provides .NET, Java, Node.js, Python, and other language-specific SDKs, making it easier for developers to integrate search capabilities into their applications. Google Maps also provides APIs and SDKs, but is more focused on providing a comprehensive set of mapping and location-based services.

  4. Data Sources: Azure Search allows you to index and search data from a wide range of sources, including Azure Blob Storage, Azure SQL Database, Azure Cosmos DB, and more. It provides connectors for popular sources and flexible options for custom data ingestion. Google Maps, on the other hand, primarily relies on its own data sources and does not provide extensive support for indexing and searching external data.

  5. Integration with Other Services: Azure Search is deeply integrated with other Azure services, such as Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and Event Grid. This allows for seamless integration with other parts of your application ecosystem. Google Maps also offers integration with other Google services, but the level of integration may be more limited compared to Azure Search.

  6. Customization and Branding: Azure Search provides options for customizing the search experience by defining scoring profiles, filters, and faceting options. It also allows you to apply your own branding to the search interface. On the other hand, Google Maps provides limited options for customization, with most of the focus on providing a consistent and familiar user experience.

Summary

In summary, Azure Search and Google Maps differ in their pricing models, primary functionality, APIs and SDKs, data sources, integration with other services, and customization options. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and requirements.

Advice on Azure Search and Google Maps

From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."

See more
Replies (6)
Recommends
on
MapboxMapbox

I use Mapbox because We need 3D maps and navigation, it has a great plugin for React and React Native which we use. Also the Mapbox Geocoder is great.

See more
Blair Gemmer
Software Engineer at VYNYL · | 2 upvotes · 161.8K views
Recommends
on
Google MapsGoogle Maps

Google Maps is best because it is practically free (they give you $300 in free credits per month and it's really hard to go over the free tier unless you really mean business) and it's the best!

See more
Recommends
on
OpenStreetMapOpenStreetMap

I use OpenStreetMap because that has a strong community. It takes some time to catch up with Google Maps, but OpenStreetMap will become great solution.

See more
Shuuji TAKAHASHI
Recommends
on
Google MapsGoogle Maps

I use Google Maps because it has a lot of great features such as Google's rich APIs, geolocation functions, navigation search feature, street map view, auto-generated 3D city map.

See more
Recommends
on
OpenStreetMapOpenStreetMap

Its open source and we use it.

See more
Fabio Fraga Machado
Recommends
on
OpenStreetMapOpenStreetMap

I use OpenStreetMap because i have the control of the environment, using Docker containers or bare-metal servers.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Azure Search
Pros of Google Maps
  • 4
    Easy to set up
  • 3
    Auto-Scaling
  • 3
    Managed
  • 2
    Easy Setup
  • 2
    More languages
  • 2
    Lucene based search criteria
  • 253
    Free
  • 136
    Address input through maps api
  • 81
    Sharable Directions
  • 47
    Google Earth
  • 46
    Unique
  • 3
    Custom maps designing

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Azure Search
Cons of Google Maps
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 4
      Google Attributions and logo
    • 1
      Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use Azure Search?
    What companies use Google Maps?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Azure Search or Google Maps.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Azure Search?
    What tools integrate with Google Maps?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Azure Search and Google Maps?
    Elasticsearch
    Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).
    Solr
    Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.
    Apache Solr
    It uses the tools you use to make application building a snap. It is built on the battle-tested Apache Zookeeper, it makes it easy to scale up and down.
    Algolia
    Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.
    See all alternatives