StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Container Service vs TeamCity

Azure Container Service vs TeamCity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Stacks97
Followers214
Votes11

Azure Container Service vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

### Introduction

Key differences between Azure Container Service and TeamCity are:

1. **Orchestration of Containers**: Azure Container Service (ACS) is a platform for managing containers using Kubernetes, DC/OS, or Docker Swarm for orchestration, while TeamCity is a continuous integration and deployment tool primarily focused on building, testing, and deploying applications.

2. **Cloud Integration**: ACS is tightly integrated with Azure cloud services, providing seamless deployment and management of containers within the Azure ecosystem, whereas TeamCity is a standalone tool that can be used with different cloud providers or on-premises servers.

3. **Purpose**: ACS is designed to provide scalable and flexible container management solutions for cloud-native applications, while TeamCity is mainly used for automating build processes and ensuring code quality in software development projects.

4. **Scalability**: ACS offers the ability to auto-scale container instances based on demand, providing elasticity for applications, whereas TeamCity focuses on optimizing build pipelines and ensuring efficient code integration and deployment.

5. **Monitoring and Logging**: ACS includes built-in monitoring and logging capabilities for tracking container performance and health, making it easier to troubleshoot and optimize containerized applications, while TeamCity requires additional plugins or integrations for comprehensive monitoring and logging functionality.

6. **Ease of Use**: ACS provides a user-friendly interface and simplified management of container resources, catering to developers and DevOps teams looking for a streamlined container orchestration solution, whereas TeamCity requires configuration and setup for customized build pipelines and workflows tailored to specific project requirements.

In Summary, Azure Container Service and TeamCity differ in orchestration capabilities, cloud integration, purpose, scalability, monitoring, and ease of use, catering to distinct needs of container management and continuous integration in software development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Create a container hosting solution optimized for Azure;Scale and orchestrate applications using Apache Mesos or Docker Swarm;Use popular open source, client-side tooling;Migrate container workloads to and from Azure without code changes
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
97
Followers
1.1K
Followers
214
Votes
316
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
Pros
  • 6
    Easy to setup, very agnostic
  • 3
    It supports Kubernetes, Mesos DC/OS and Docker Swarm
  • 2
    It has a nice command line interface (CLI) tool
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker
Docker
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Azure Container Service?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana