StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Workflow Manager
  5. AWS Step Functions vs Camunda

AWS Step Functions vs Camunda

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Camunda
Camunda
Stacks192
Followers216
Votes0
AWS Step Functions
AWS Step Functions
Stacks237
Followers391
Votes31

AWS Step Functions vs Camunda: What are the differences?

Introduction

Step Functions and Camunda are both workflow management tools used for orchestrating and automating business processes. While they serve a similar purpose, there are notable differences between the two. This article highlights key differences between AWS Step Functions and Camunda.

  1. Integration with Cloud Infrastructure: AWS Step Functions is tightly integrated with the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud infrastructure, allowing seamless workflow orchestration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Camunda is a standalone workflow engine that can be integrated with various technologies and platforms, including the cloud.

  2. Development Environment: AWS Step Functions provides a web-based console for designing, visualizing, and managing workflows. It offers a graphical interface for building workflows using a visual language called Amazon States Language (ASL). Camunda, on the other hand, offers a drag-and-drop workflow editor that allows users to define and modify workflows visually.

  3. Deployment Flexibility: AWS Step Functions workflows are deployed and executed on the AWS cloud. This can be advantageous for organizations that rely on other AWS services or prefer a fully managed workflow service. In contrast, Camunda can be deployed on-premises or in various cloud environments, providing more deployment flexibility.

  4. Pricing Model: AWS Step Functions follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the number of state transitions. The pricing is granular and aligns with the resources consumed. Camunda, on the other hand, offers both open-source and enterprise editions. The open-source edition of Camunda is free, while the enterprise edition provides additional features and support with a pricing based on subscription plans.

  5. Extensibility and Customization: AWS Step Functions allows users to extend its capabilities using Lambda functions, enabling custom logic and integration with external systems. Camunda offers a wide range of extensibility options, including custom scripting, Java plugins, REST APIs, and other integration mechanisms, allowing users to tailor the workflow engine to specific requirements.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: AWS Step Functions benefits from being part of the larger AWS ecosystem, which includes a vast number of services, documentation, and support resources. Camunda has a vibrant community and offers extensive documentation, forums, and professional support, along with integration connectors for popular technologies, fostering an active user community.

In Summary, AWS Step Functions and Camunda differ in terms of integration with cloud infrastructure, development environment, deployment flexibility, pricing model, extensibility and customization options, as well as community and ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Camunda
Camunda
AWS Step Functions
AWS Step Functions

Camunda enables organizations to operationalize and automate AI, integrating human tasks, existing and future systems without compromising security, governance, or innovation.

AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.

Agentic orchestration; Process orchestration; Workflow automation; Decision automation
-
Statistics
Stacks
192
Stacks
237
Followers
216
Followers
391
Votes
0
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Integration with other services
  • 5
    Complex workflows
  • 5
    Pricing
  • 5
    Easily Accessible via AWS Console
  • 3
    Workflow Processing
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Asana
Asana
HubSpot
HubSpot
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Kafka
Kafka
Redis
Redis
Google Cloud VPC
Google Cloud VPC
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Camunda, AWS Step Functions?

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Apache Beam

Apache Beam

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Luigi

Luigi

It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.

Unito

Unito

Build and map powerful workflows across tools to save your team time. No coding required. Create rules to define what information flows between each of your tools, in minutes.

Shipyard

Shipyard

na

Vison AI

Vison AI

Hire AI Employees that deliver Human-Quality work. Automate repetitive tasks, scale effortlessly, and focus on business growth without increasing head count.

PromptX

PromptX

PromptX is an AI-powered enterprise knowledge and workflow platform that helps organizations search, discover and act on information with speed and accuracy. It unifies data from SharePoint, Google Drive, email, cloud systems and legacy databases into one secure Enterprise Knowledge System. Using generative and agentic AI, users can ask natural language questions and receive context-rich, verifiable answers in seconds. PromptX ingests and enriches content with semantic tagging, entity recognition and knowledge cards, turning unstructured data into actionable insights. With adaptive prompts, collaborative workspaces and AI-driven workflows, teams make faster, data-backed decisions. The platform includes RBAC, SSO, audit trails and compliance-ready AI governance, and integrates with any LLM or external search engine. It supports cloud, hybrid and on-premise deployments for healthcare, public sector, finance and enterprise service providers. PromptX converts disconnected data into trusted and actionable intelligence, bringing search, collaboration and automation into a single unified experience.

Aviator Runbooks

Aviator Runbooks

Runbooks, a spec-driven development product that lets teams author versioned, executable specs so AI agents can safely run, review, and improve code with multiplayer collaboration and audit trails.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase