StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. AWS CodePipeline vs Gerrit Code Review

AWS CodePipeline vs Gerrit Code Review

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

AWS CodePipeline vs Gerrit Code Review: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, tools like AWS CodePipeline and Gerrit Code Review play a crucial role in ensuring efficient code deployment and review processes. Despite having similar objectives, they possess distinct differences that cater to different needs and preferences of development teams.

  1. Hosted vs. Self-hosted: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed service by Amazon Web Services, meaning users do not have to set up or maintain the infrastructure. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review is a self-hosted solution, giving teams more control over their environment but requiring maintenance and resources to manage it effectively.

  2. Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, allowing for automated workflows across various stages of application deployment. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review offers integrations with a wide range of tools and services beyond AWS, providing flexibility for users to tailor their workflows to specific requirements.

  3. Focus on Continuous Integration vs. Code Review: AWS CodePipeline primarily focuses on the continuous integration and delivery of code, streamlining the process from source code to production. Conversely, Gerrit Code Review places a strong emphasis on collaborative code reviews, ensuring code quality and fostering a culture of peer feedback and improvement.

  4. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodePipeline offers scalability and flexibility in scaling resources up or down based on the workload, making it suitable for projects with fluctuating demands. In comparison, Gerrit Code Review may require additional configurations and resources to accommodate growing development teams and code repositories effectively.

  5. User Interface and Experience: AWS CodePipeline provides a polished web interface that simplifies the setup and management of pipelines, with intuitive visualization of workflow stages and actions. Gerrit Code Review, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to a more complex interface and configuration settings.

  6. Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing model, charging users based on the resources consumed throughout the pipeline processes. Gerrit Code Review, being a self-hosted solution, entails upfront costs for infrastructure setup and maintenance, which may incur additional expenses in the long run.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline and Gerrit Code Review differ significantly in their hosting, integration capabilities, focus areas, scalability, user experience, and pricing model, catering to diverse needs and preferences in the software development landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
551
Stacks
116
Followers
933
Followers
223
Votes
30
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 10
    Open source
Integrations
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to AWS CodePipeline, Gerrit Code Review?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana