AWS CloudFormation vs Terraform: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this article, we will compare AWS CloudFormation and Terraform, two widely used infrastructure as code (IaC) tools. Both tools enable users to define and provision infrastructure resources in a declarative manner, but there are key differences between them that set them apart.
-
Language and Syntax: AWS CloudFormation uses JSON or YAML templates to define infrastructure resources and their dependencies. On the other hand, Terraform uses its own domain-specific language (HCL) to define infrastructure as code. While both are human-readable, HCL provides a more concise and expressive syntax compared to JSON or YAML.
-
Provider Support: AWS CloudFormation is an AWS-native tool and exclusively supports resources provided by AWS services. In contrast, Terraform is cloud-agnostic and supports a wide range of cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and many others. This makes Terraform a more flexible choice when working with a multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environment.
-
State Management: AWS CloudFormation manages the state of resources provisioned by storing it within the AWS service itself. This simplifies state management for users as there is no need to handle the state externally. On the other hand, Terraform uses a separate backend such as a database or a file system to store its state. This allows for more control and flexibility over state management but requires additional configuration and handling.
-
Resource Lifecycle Management: AWS CloudFormation provides built-in functionality for managing the lifecycle of resources, including creating, updating, and deleting resources. Terraform, on the other hand, requires users to explicitly define resource lifecycles using its own syntax. While this provides more fine-grained control over resource management, it also adds complexity to the configuration.
-
Community and Ecosystem: AWS CloudFormation has a large community and an extensive ecosystem of pre-built templates and resources available for use. This makes it easy to find and leverage existing templates and configurations. Terraform also has a growing community and ecosystem, but it may not have the same breadth and depth as AWS CloudFormation in terms of ready-to-use resources.
-
Integration with External Tools: Due to its cloud-agnostic nature, Terraform can integrate with various external tools and providers, enabling it to be part of a larger toolchain or workflow. This flexibility allows users to integrate Terraform with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, configuration management tools, and other infrastructure automation tools. AWS CloudFormation, being AWS-native, is tightly integrated with other AWS services, making it easier to use within the AWS ecosystem.
In Summary, AWS CloudFormation and Terraform are both powerful infrastructure as code tools, but they have distinct differences. AWS CloudFormation is tightly integrated with AWS services and simplifies state management, while Terraform offers a more flexible and cloud-agnostic approach with support for multiple cloud providers and a greater degree of control. Your choice between the two will depend on your specific requirements and the cloud environment you are working with.
