Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS AppSync vs CouchDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
AWS AppSync and CouchDB are two different technologies that can be used for various purposes. Here are the key differences between the two:
Data Structure and Query Language: AWS AppSync uses GraphQL as its query language, which allows clients to specify the exact data requirements they need. This enables efficient data fetching and reduces over-fetching or under-fetching of data. On the other hand, CouchDB uses a flexible JSON-based document model for storing and retrieving data, making it easy to work with unstructured or semi-structured data.
Data Replication and Sync: AWS AppSync provides built-in real-time data synchronization capabilities, allowing clients to receive live updates from the backend without the need for manual polling. CouchDB, on the other hand, has a built-in peer-to-peer replication feature that allows multiple database instances to synchronize and stay consistent with each other.
Deployment and Scalability: With AWS AppSync, you can leverage the scalability and availability of the AWS cloud platform. It handles all the underlying infrastructure for you, allowing you to focus on the application logic. CouchDB, on the other hand, can be deployed on any server or cloud platform, giving you more flexibility in terms of deployment options.
Authentication and Authorization: AWS AppSync has built-in support for integrating with AWS Cognito, which provides user authentication and authorization capabilities. This makes it easier to secure your applications and manage user access. CouchDB also has built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms, but it may require additional configuration and customization to integrate with external identity providers.
Serverless Architecture: AWS AppSync can be used in a serverless architecture, where you only pay for the actual usage of the service and don't have to manage any servers. This makes it easy to scale and reduces operational overhead. CouchDB, on the other hand, requires you to set up and manage the database server yourself, which may involve more operational effort.
Integration and Ecosystem: AWS AppSync is tightly integrated with other AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, DynamoDB, and others, allowing you to easily build serverless applications. It also has a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries and tools that can enhance its capabilities. CouchDB has its own ecosystem of plugins and integrations, but it may have fewer options compared to AWS AppSync's extensive ecosystem.
In Summary, AWS AppSync and CouchDB differ in terms of their data structure and query language, data replication and sync capabilities, deployment and scalability options, authentication and authorization mechanisms, support for a serverless architecture, and the richness of their integration and ecosystem.
We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .
Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.
It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.
Pros of AWS AppSync
- GraphQL9
- Real-Time6
- Offline3
- Apollo3
- Fully managed and scalable GraphQL Resolver!2
- Backed by Amazon2
- BaaS2
- AWS2
- Enterprise Security1
Pros of CouchDB
- JSON43
- Open source30
- Highly available18
- Partition tolerant12
- Eventual consistency11
- Sync7
- REST API5
- Attachments mechanism to docs4
- Multi master replication4
- Changes feed3
- REST interface1
- js- and erlang-views1