Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Auth0 vs sso: What are the differences?
Introduction
Auth0 and SSO are both authentication and authorization solutions, but they have key differences in their functionality and approach.
Implementation: Auth0 is a cloud-based identity platform that provides identity management, user authentication, and authorization services as a service. It provides ready-to-use authentication features that can be easily integrated into web and mobile applications. On the other hand, SSO (Single Sign-On) is a mechanism that allows users to authenticate once and access multiple applications within an organization without re-entering their credentials. It is usually implemented using standards like SAML or OAuth.
Integration: Auth0 offers a wide range of integration options and can be used with various identity providers, social login providers, and enterprise directories. It provides support for custom identity providers and can be easily integrated into existing systems. SSO, on the other hand, typically requires more upfront work to set up and configure for each application. It may also require additional software installation and infrastructure changes.
Scalability: Auth0 is highly scalable and can handle authentication and authorization for millions of users and thousands of applications. It allows for easy management of user identities and access control policies. SSO can also handle a large number of users, but it requires careful planning and infrastructure scaling to ensure smooth operation as the number of applications and users grows.
Centralized control: Auth0 provides a centralized dashboard for managing user identities, access control policies, and authentication settings. It allows administrators to have a unified view of user authentication and authorization across all their applications. SSO also offers centralized control but typically requires additional setup and configuration for each application.
Flexibility: Auth0 offers a high degree of flexibility in terms of customization and configuration. It allows developers to define custom authentication flows, implement custom authorization rules, and extend the platform using custom scripts. SSO, on the other hand, may have more limitations in terms of customization and flexibility, as it relies on standard protocols and predefined authentication mechanisms.
Cost: Auth0 is a subscription-based service that offers different pricing plans based on the number of users and features required. The cost of using Auth0 depends on factors like the number of active users, usage volume, and additional services used. SSO implementations can vary in cost depending on factors like infrastructure requirements, licensing fees for software, and ongoing maintenance costs.
In summary, Auth0 is a cloud-based identity platform that provides ready-to-use authentication and authorization services with various integration options and high scalability. SSO is a mechanism that allows users to authenticate once and access multiple applications, typically requiring more setup and customization for each application.
We need to migrate our authentication system to an external solution. We have a Vue.js frontend and a set of Services (mostly in Python) that talk to each other through APIs. This platform is multitenant, having all tenants in the same DB (MongoDB) and discriminating between them with a parameter value. So I'll be grateful if someone can share their experiences with any of these three options!
If these three are your options, I would recommend going with Auth0. They have all functionality available as developer API (Okta e.g. not) so you can manage your instance with Infrastructure as code and can also easily add functionalities relatively easily with the API. They are also really powerful if we're talking about ABAC (Attribute based access control). You can also enrich your access token with custom claims from your MongoDB, that can be probably really useful, as you said that you're dealing with multi tenancy.
We're using Auth0 in combination with Fauna Fauna is a database, so it would challenge you're mongodb. But Faunadb is the first database that implemented a full end user ABAC system directly in the database. (And also a lot easier than the ABAC systems from Okta or Auth0). This helps us, to use Auth0 only as identity platform and doing all the authorization with enriched claims over Fauna. With that you can skip in a lot of the cases you're backend, and you can request directly from the frontend your database (Blazing fast). Also, you can replace in some years Auth0 a lot easier with some upcoming cheaper (Auth0 was bought by Okta for a hilarious price) and "easy to use" passwordless identity provider like Passage.id
Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?
As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?
I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!
Using Auth0 and JWT with a simple session management server is easy and takes care of a lot of the hassle of setting up authentication. We feel safe having Auth0 handle and store our user data knowing their databases are way more secure than anything we could have setup ourselves. They also provide great tools like WebHooks and action events to pull critical metadata to our API when we need it.
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.
Pros of Auth0
- JSON web token70
- Integration with 20+ Social Providers31
- It's a universal solution20
- SDKs20
- Amazing Documentation15
- Heroku Add-on11
- Enterprise support8
- Great Sample Repos7
- Extend platform with "rules"7
- Azure Add-on4
- Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider3
- Passwordless3
- It can integrate seamlessly with firebase2
- Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support2
- Polished2
- On-premise deployment2
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance1
- MFA1
- Active Directory support1
- Springboot1
- SOC21
- SAML Support1
- Great support1
- OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support1
Pros of sso
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Auth0
- Pricing too high (Developer Pro)15
- Poor support7
- Rapidly changing API4
- Status page not reflect actual status4