StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs Spring Security

Auth0 vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K

Auth0 vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language that is commonly used for formatting text on websites. In this task, we will format the provided information about the key differences between Auth0 and Spring Security using Markdown code.

Key Differences Between Auth0 and Spring Security

  1. Authentication and Authorization Approach: Auth0 is a cloud-based identity management platform that provides authentication and authorization services as a service, while Spring Security is a Java framework that offers a comprehensive set of security features for applications. Auth0 simplifies the authentication and authorization process by providing ready-to-use features and integrations, whereas Spring Security provides more flexibility and control over the security implementation.

  2. Integration and Compatibility: Auth0 is platform agnostic and can integrate seamlessly with various programming languages, frameworks, and platforms, including Java. On the other hand, Spring Security is a Java-centric framework designed specifically for Java-based applications, making it highly compatible and tightly integrated with the Java ecosystem.

  3. Ease of Use and Configuration: Auth0 is designed to be user-friendly and provides a user-friendly dashboard where developers can configure various authentication and authorization parameters. It offers a wide range of pre-built templates and customization options for branding and user experience. In comparison, Spring Security requires more setup and configuration, but it provides a high level of customization and control over the security implementation.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Auth0 is a cloud-based service that caters to high scalability and performance requirements. It can handle millions of users and authenticate requests efficiently. Spring Security, being a framework, can also handle large-scale applications but may require additional configurations and optimizations to achieve similar scalability and performance levels as Auth0.

  5. Support and Documentation: Auth0 provides comprehensive documentation, guides, and tutorials to help developers understand and implement authentication and authorization features. It also offers support through forums, documentation, and dedicated customer support channels. Spring Security, as an open-source project, has a vast community and extensive documentation, along with active community support and regular updates.

  6. Cost and Pricing Model: Auth0 follows a subscription-based pricing model, where the cost is determined based on factors such as the number of users, active users, and specific features required. The pricing can vary depending on the selected plan and additional services. In contrast, Spring Security is an open-source framework and does not incur any direct cost. However, the implementation and maintenance costs may vary depending on the complexity of the application and the expertise required.

In summary, Auth0 is a cloud-based identity management platform that provides ready-to-use authentication and authorization services with platform agnostic integration. It offers simplicity and ease of use but comes with a subscription-based cost. On the other hand, Spring Security is a flexible Java-centric framework that provides control and customization over security implementation. It is highly compatible with the Java ecosystem and has no direct cost, but requires more setup and configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, Spring Security

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
Spring Security
Spring Security

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
559
Followers
2.1K
Followers
589
Votes
215
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
Pros
  • 3
    Java integration
  • 3
    Easy to use
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to Auth0, Spring Security?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope