StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs JSON Web Token

Auth0 vs JSON Web Token

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374

Auth0 vs JSON Web Token: What are the differences?

Auth0 is an identity and access management platform for secure authentication, while JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact data format commonly used for securely transmitting information in web applications, often employed in Auth0's authentication process. Let's explore the key differences between the two.

  1. Integration and Functionality: Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management platform that provides a range of authentication and authorization features, including user management, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and social logins. On the other hand, JWT is a specific type of token format that is commonly used for securely transmitting authentication and authorization information between parties.

  2. Authentication vs Token Format: Auth0 focuses on providing a seamless authentication experience, allowing developers to easily integrate various authentication methods into their applications. In contrast, JWT is purely a token format that represents claims about the user and can be used to securely authenticate and authorize requests.

  3. Centralized vs Decentralized: Auth0 is a centralized identity provider solution, where all authentication requests are handled by the Auth0 service. In contrast, JWT is a decentralized token format, allowing the authentication and authorization logic to be implemented within the applications themselves.

  4. Out-of-the-box Features: Auth0 provides several out-of-the-box features such as user management, social logins, customizable login flows, passwordless authentication, and robust security measures. JWT, being a token format, does not offer these features directly. However, it can be used within the Auth0 platform or in conjunction with other authentication systems to enhance security.

  5. Scalability and Maintenance: Auth0 handles the infrastructure and maintenance of the authentication system, ensuring scalability, reliability, and security. Using Auth0 allows developers to focus on their core applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. With JWT, developers are responsible for implementing and maintaining the authentication and authorization logic within their applications, which may require additional efforts for scalability and maintenance.

  6. Vendor Lock-in: Auth0 is a third-party service, meaning that relying heavily on Auth0 for authentication may result in vendor lock-in. On the other hand, JWT is a standard token format that can be used independently of any specific authentication service, providing more flexibility and avoiding vendor lock-in.

In summary, Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management platform that offers various authentication and authorization features, while JWT is a token format used to securely transmit authentication and authorization information. Auth0 provides out-of-the-box features, handles infrastructure and maintenance, and may result in vendor lock-in, whereas JWT allows decentralized implementation, requires manual integration and maintenance, but offers more flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, JSON Web Token

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
compact;self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
374
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
2.1K
Followers
367
Votes
215
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Auth0, JSON Web Token?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope