Auth0 vs Guardian

Overview

Auth0

Stacks1.4K

Followers2.1K

Votes215

Guardian

Stacks7

Followers18

Votes0

Auth0 vs Guardian: What are the differences?

Integration with Identity Providers: Auth0 provides seamless integration with various identity providers such as Google, Facebook, and Microsoft, making it easier for developers to implement single sign-on in their applications. In contrast, Guardian focuses on providing two-factor authentication and does not offer the same level of integration with external identity providers.
Customization Options: Auth0 offers extensive customization options for branding, login flows, and user experiences, allowing developers to tailor the authentication process to meet specific requirements. On the other hand, Guardian has limited customization capabilities and primarily focuses on providing secure two-factor authentication solutions.
Scalability: Auth0 is designed to scale with the growth of an application, offering enterprise-grade authentication services that can handle large volumes of users and traffic. Guardian, while secure, may face scalability challenges when dealing with high traffic loads and user volumes due to its more limited feature set focused on two-factor authentication.
Authentication Protocols Supported: Auth0 supports a wide range of authentication protocols such as OAuth, OpenID Connect, and SAML, making it versatile and compatible with a variety of applications and systems. Guardian, in contrast, is more specialized in supporting two-factor authentication protocols, limiting its compatibility with certain types of applications and systems that require different authentication methods.
User Management Features: Auth0 provides advanced user management features such as user profile management, role-based access control, and user provisioning, enabling developers to have more control over user permissions and access levels. Guardian, on the other hand, focuses more on authentication security features and may lack some of the advanced user management capabilities offered by Auth0.
Support and Documentation: Auth0 provides robust support options, including documentation, community forums, and technical support, to help developers effectively integrate and troubleshoot authentication processes. In comparison, Guardian may have more limited support options available, which could potentially impact the ease of implementation and maintenance for developers.

In Summary, Auth0 offers comprehensive authentication solutions with extensive integration options and customization capabilities, scalability, support for multiple authentication protocols, advanced user management features, while Guardian is more focused on providing secure two-factor authentication solutions with limited customization and scalability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Auth0, Guardian

Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k

Comments

Ryan

Aug 30, 2021

Needs adviceon

Firebase Authentication

Auth0

Okta

Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

1.16M views1.16M

Comments

Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0	Guardian
A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.	Avoid dealing with OAuth logic in your code, and spend more time creating your product. Guardian reduces the OAuth footprint in your code to a single request. Built with modularity in mind, Guardian leverages plugins to handle OAuth flows, should you encounter a flow that Guardian doesn't handle, create a small flow plugin to do so and carry on. Guardian comes with 5 pre-made plugins that cover 99% of OAuth services.
User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs	Perfect for both production and testing;Guardian is centralized and easily configurable to allow multiple environments giving you the flexibility you need
Statistics
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 7
Followers 2.1K	Followers 18
Votes 215	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 70 JSON web token 31 Integration with 20+ Social Providers 20 It's a universal solution 20 SDKs 15 Amazing Documentation Cons 15 Pricing too high (Developer Pro) 7 Poor support 4 Rapidly changing API 4 Status page not reflect actual status	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon S3 Salesforce Sales Cloud Parse Firebase Ruby PHP Laravel Python Java Spring	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Auth0, Guardian?

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Auth0 vs Guardian: What are the differences?

Integration with Identity Providers: Auth0 provides seamless integration with various identity providers such as Google, Facebook, and Microsoft, making it easier for developers to implement single sign-on in their applications. In contrast, Guardian focuses on providing two-factor authentication and does not offer the same level of integration with external identity providers.
Customization Options: Auth0 offers extensive customization options for branding, login flows, and user experiences, allowing developers to tailor the authentication process to meet specific requirements. On the other hand, Guardian has limited customization capabilities and primarily focuses on providing secure two-factor authentication solutions.
Scalability: Auth0 is designed to scale with the growth of an application, offering enterprise-grade authentication services that can handle large volumes of users and traffic. Guardian, while secure, may face scalability challenges when dealing with high traffic loads and user volumes due to its more limited feature set focused on two-factor authentication.
Authentication Protocols Supported: Auth0 supports a wide range of authentication protocols such as OAuth, OpenID Connect, and SAML, making it versatile and compatible with a variety of applications and systems. Guardian, in contrast, is more specialized in supporting two-factor authentication protocols, limiting its compatibility with certain types of applications and systems that require different authentication methods.
User Management Features: Auth0 provides advanced user management features such as user profile management, role-based access control, and user provisioning, enabling developers to have more control over user permissions and access levels. Guardian, on the other hand, focuses more on authentication security features and may lack some of the advanced user management capabilities offered by Auth0.
Support and Documentation: Auth0 provides robust support options, including documentation, community forums, and technical support, to help developers effectively integrate and troubleshoot authentication processes. In comparison, Guardian may have more limited support options available, which could potentially impact the ease of implementation and maintenance for developers.

Auth0 vs Guardian

Overview