StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs Devise

Auth0 vs Devise

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56

Auth0 vs Devise: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Auth0 and Devise, highlighting the key differences between these two authentication solutions.

  1. Integration flexibility: Auth0 provides a flexible integration with various programming languages, frameworks, and platforms, allowing developers to easily implement authentication across different technologies. On the other hand, Devise is mainly designed for Ruby on Rails applications, limiting its integration options to this specific framework.

  2. Authentication methods: Auth0 supports a wide range of authentication methods, including social login, passwordless authentication, multi-factor authentication, and more. Devise, on the other hand, primarily focuses on traditional email/password authentication, with limited built-in support for other methods. Additional functionality needs to be implemented manually in Devise.

  3. Scalability and performance: Auth0 is built to handle high-scale authentication requirements, providing a global infrastructure with multiple data centers. This ensures excellent performance and availability even under heavy loads. In contrast, Devise relies on the hosting infrastructure of the application it is integrated with, which might not be optimized for high scalability and performance.

  4. Security and compliance: Auth0 provides enterprise-grade security features, including secure token storage, encryption, threat monitoring, and compliance with industry standards like GDPR and SOC 2. Devise, while offering basic security measures, may require additional implementation to reach the same level of security and compliance.

  5. Third-party integrations: Auth0 offers extensive integrations with third-party services, such as identity providers and user management systems. This makes it easier to connect with existing systems and leverage their functionalities. Devise, on the other hand, might require more manual configuration and custom development to achieve similar integrations.

  6. Development speed and ease of use: Auth0 provides a comprehensive authentication-as-a-service solution with ready-to-use features, user interfaces, and SDKs. This allows developers to quickly implement authentication without spending much time on boilerplate code. Devise, while being a popular authentication solution for Ruby on Rails, requires more manual configuration and customization, which can slow down development speed.

In summary, Auth0 offers more integration flexibility, supports a wider range of authentication methods, provides better scalability, security, and compliance features, and offers easier third-party integrations compared to Devise. Auth0 also provides rapid development capabilities with ready-to-use features, while Devise requires more manual configuration and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, Devise

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Ryan
Ryan

Aug 30, 2021

Needs adviceonFirebase AuthenticationFirebase AuthenticationAuth0Auth0OktaOkta

Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

1.16M views1.16M
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
Devise
Devise

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
535
Followers
2.1K
Followers
232
Votes
215
Votes
56
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
Rails
Rails

What are some alternatives to Auth0, Devise?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope