Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Aurelia vs Ember.js: What are the differences?
Aurelia: Next gen JS framework written with ES6 and ES7. Integrates with Web Components. No external dependencies except polyfills. Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity; Ember.js: A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps. Ember.js is a JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; Ember.js does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.
Aurelia and Ember.js belong to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
"Simple with conventions" is the primary reason why developers consider Aurelia over the competitors, whereas "Elegant" was stated as the key factor in picking Ember.js.
Aurelia and Ember.js are both open source tools. Ember.js with 21.1K GitHub stars and 4.17K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Aurelia with 11.1K GitHub stars and 665 GitHub forks.
DigitalOcean, Twitch, and Square are some of the popular companies that use Ember.js, whereas Aurelia is used by NOD studios, Strengthen, and SupplyPike. Ember.js has a broader approval, being mentioned in 293 company stacks & 76 developers stacks; compared to Aurelia, which is listed in 17 company stacks and 11 developer stacks.
Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?
With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.
Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/
Pros of Aurelia
- Simple with conventions47
- Modern architecture42
- Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework39
- Extensible31
- Integrates well with other components28
- Easy to use27
- Dependency Injection25
- Modular22
- Great router20
- Adaptive Data Binding16
- Typescript, ES2015, ES201613
- IoC, Modularity, Simplicity, Full Stack11
- Good binding system9
- Based on ES79
- Testable6
- Convention based6
- Quick to develop5
- Solid Documentation4
- Evolving standards compliance4
- Smooth learning curve4
- Outstanding Support (paid)4
- Reactive binding system1
- TypeScript1
Pros of Ember.js
- Elegant126
- Quick to develop97
- Great mvc83
- Great community82
- Great router73
- Values conventions, there is one-true way to organize52
- Open source50
- Components44
- Mvc framework34
- Handlebars.js28
- Htmlbars13
- Yehuda katz11
- Tom dale10
- Great logo10
- It's NOT Google or Facebook6
- manages large data sets on the front end easily5
- Convention over Configuration5
- Glimmer: react-like rendering engine5
- Organized4
- Fast4
- Enterprise4
- Intelligent4
- It rocks4
- Good docs3
- Fastest spinning circles3
- IE8 support3
- Easy and Quick to develop2
- Documentation is finally active and updated2
- Flexibility1
- Business wins1
- Comprehensive1
- Great for big apps/many devs because its organized1
- Growing community1
- For building ambitious Web apps1
- Dependency Injection1
- Stability without stagnation1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Aurelia
Cons of Ember.js
- Very little flexibility2
- Too much convention, too little configuration2
- Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps1
- Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Aurelia?
What is Ember.js?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Aurelia?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Aurelia?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+26
+26