Aura vs Skylight

Overview

Aura

Stacks53

Followers56

Votes1

GitHub Stars2.9K

Forks255

Skylight

Stacks105

Followers69

Votes51

Aura vs Skylight: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Aura and Skylight, two technologies commonly used in web development.

Deployment Model: Aura is a client-based framework developed by Salesforce, while Skylight is a server-based framework developed by Heroku. Aura is primarily used for developing applications that run on the Salesforce platform, whereas Skylight is used for hosting applications on the Heroku platform.
Language Used: Aura is primarily written in JavaScript and supports both server-side and client-side programming. On the other hand, Skylight uses Ruby as its primary programming language and is specifically designed for server-side development.
Usability: Aura is most suitable for building complex, enterprise-grade applications that require a large amount of customization and integration with the Salesforce platform. It provides features like data binding, event-driven architecture, and a rich component library. Skylight, on the other hand, is more focused on simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for rapid prototyping or building small to medium-sized applications.
Community Support: Aura has a large and vibrant community of developers due to its association with Salesforce. This means there are extensive resources, documentation, and support available for developers working with Aura. Skylight, being a less widely used framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.
Ecosystem Integration: Aura has built-in integration with Salesforce's ecosystem, allowing developers to seamlessly leverage other Salesforce products and services in their applications. Skylight, being developed by Heroku, integrates well with other Heroku services and add-ons, providing developers with a wide range of options for hosting, scaling, and managing their applications.
Learning Curve: Aura, with its extensive feature set and complexity, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the Salesforce platform or client-side development. Skylight, being a simpler framework, may have a lower learning curve, making it more accessible to developers with different skill levels.

In summary, Aura and Skylight differ in their deployment model, programming language, usability, community support, ecosystem integration, and learning curve. Aura is more focused on developing enterprise-grade applications on the Salesforce platform, while Skylight emphasizes simplicity and ease of use for server-side development on the Heroku platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Aura	Skylight
The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase.	Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.
-	Skylight looks at how your code is behaving in production, alerting you to improvements you can make before they become showstoppers.;Skylight tells you exactly how your app is spending its time where it matters most—in your production environment;Pricing starts at $20 for the first million requests, with automatic discounts for high-volume customers;Skylight is built with badass hipster tech: Ruby on Rails, Ember.js, Rust, Storm, Dropwizard, Kafka, Cassandra, and more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 255	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 53	Stacks 105
Followers 56	Followers 69
Votes 1	Votes 51
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Open source	Pros 11 Beautiful UI 8 Made by ember.js and rails core team members 8 Sort by 'agony' - lists low hanging fruit fixes 7 Actionable analytics with concrete numbers 6 Free tier Cons 1 Comparing different timeframes is difficult
Integrations
PHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Aura, Skylight?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Aura vs Skylight: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Aura and Skylight, two technologies commonly used in web development.

Deployment Model: Aura is a client-based framework developed by Salesforce, while Skylight is a server-based framework developed by Heroku. Aura is primarily used for developing applications that run on the Salesforce platform, whereas Skylight is used for hosting applications on the Heroku platform.
Language Used: Aura is primarily written in JavaScript and supports both server-side and client-side programming. On the other hand, Skylight uses Ruby as its primary programming language and is specifically designed for server-side development.
Usability: Aura is most suitable for building complex, enterprise-grade applications that require a large amount of customization and integration with the Salesforce platform. It provides features like data binding, event-driven architecture, and a rich component library. Skylight, on the other hand, is more focused on simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for rapid prototyping or building small to medium-sized applications.
Community Support: Aura has a large and vibrant community of developers due to its association with Salesforce. This means there are extensive resources, documentation, and support available for developers working with Aura. Skylight, being a less widely used framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.
Ecosystem Integration: Aura has built-in integration with Salesforce's ecosystem, allowing developers to seamlessly leverage other Salesforce products and services in their applications. Skylight, being developed by Heroku, integrates well with other Heroku services and add-ons, providing developers with a wide range of options for hosting, scaling, and managing their applications.
Learning Curve: Aura, with its extensive feature set and complexity, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the Salesforce platform or client-side development. Skylight, being a simpler framework, may have a lower learning curve, making it more accessible to developers with different skill levels.

Aura vs Skylight

Overview

Aura vs Skylight: What are the differences?