StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. Atom vs GitHub Enterprise

Atom vs GitHub Enterprise

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atom
Atom
Stacks16.9K
Followers14.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars60.8K
Forks17.3K
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10

Atom vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Cost and Business Model: Atom is an open-source text editor that is free to use for individuals or organizations, while GitHub Enterprise is a paid solution that offers additional features aimed specifically for businesses and large teams, providing enhanced security and compliance functionalities.

  2. 2. Customization and Extensibility: Atom offers extensive customization options, allowing users to personalize their editor by installing a wide range of community-developed themes and packages. On the other hand, GitHub Enterprise offers a more limited customization capability, as it is primarily focused on providing a secure and streamlined platform for collaborative software development.

  3. 3. Collaboration Features: GitHub Enterprise excels in providing collaboration features specifically tailored for software development teams, such as pull requests, issue tracking, and integrated code reviews. Atom, on the other hand, is more focused on individual code editing and lacks these built-in collaboration functionalities.

  4. 4. Hosting and Deployment: Atom is a desktop-based text editor that runs locally on the user's machine, while GitHub Enterprise is a cloud-based platform that allows for easy remote access and collaboration without the need for individual installations. This difference in deployment options can influence the choice based on factors such as team distribution and infrastructure preferences.

  5. 5. Integration with other tools: Atom offers a wide range of integrations, allowing seamless interaction with other development tools and services. GitHub Enterprise, being a complete development platform, provides native integrations with a broader set of widely-used tools and services, such as continuous integration and deployment systems.

  6. 6. Security and Compliance: GitHub Enterprise offers enterprise-grade security features, including advanced access controls, audit logs, and compliance certifications, ensuring data protection and regulatory compliance. Atom, as an individual-focused text editor, does not offer these enterprise-level security and compliance functionalities.

In Summary, Atom and GitHub Enterprise differ in terms of cost and business model, customization and extensibility options, collaboration features, hosting and deployment models, integration capabilities with other development tools, and security and compliance offerings.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Atom, GitHub Enterprise

Eric
Eric

DevOps at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceonBitbucketBitbucketCrucibleCrucibleConfluenceConfluence

We are using a Bitbucket server, and due to migration efforts and new Atlassian community license changes, we need to move to a new self-hosted solution. The new data-center license for Atlassian, available in February, will be community provisioned (free). Along with that community license, other technologies will be coming with it (Crucible, Confluence, and Jira). Is there value in a paid-for license to get the GitHub Enterprise? Are the tools that come with it worth the cost?

I know it is about $20 per 10 seats, and we have about 300 users. Have other convertees to Microsoft's tools found it easy to do a migration? Is the toolset that much more beneficial to the free suite that one can get from Atlassian?

So far, free seems to be the winner, and the familiarization with Atlassian implementation and maintenance is understood. Going to GitHub, are there any distinct challenges to be found or any perks to be attained?

549k views549k
Comments
Darius
Darius

Dec 19, 2020

Review

These are pretty competitive, and to recommend one over the other would require understanding your usage. Also, what other tools you use: for instance, what do you use for Issue-tracking, or for build pipelines. In your case, since you are already using Bitbucket, the question would be: do you have any current pain-points? And, on the other hand, do you already use Atlassian's JIRA, where you'd benefit from the tight integration? So, though I would not recommend one over the other just in general,. But, if Bitbucket fulfills your current use-cases, then there seems to be little motivation to move.

317k views317k
Comments
Andrey
Andrey

Managing Partner at WhiteLabelDevelopers

May 18, 2020

Decided

Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark

539k views539k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atom
Atom
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Atom is a desktop application based on web technologies;Node.js integration;Modular Design- composed of over 50 open-source packages that integrate around a minimal core;File system browser;Fuzzy finder for quickly opening files;Fast project-wide search and replace;Multiple cursors and selections;Multiple panes;Snippets;Code folding;A clean preferences UI;Import TextMate grammars and themes
Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
60.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
17.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
500
Followers
14.5K
Followers
627
Votes
2.5K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 529
    Free
  • 449
    Open source
  • 343
    Modular design
  • 321
    Hackable
  • 316
    Beautiful UI
Cons
  • 19
    Slow with large files
  • 7
    Slow startup
  • 2
    Most of the time packages are hard to find.
  • 1
    Can be easily Modified
  • 1
    Cannot Run code with F5
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Atom, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana