Atom vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Atom

Stacks16.9K

Followers14.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars60.8K

Forks17.3K

Atom vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Platform: Atom is a text editor developed by GitHub, while Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian. Atom is primarily used for programming and coding purposes, whereas Bitbucket is used for hosting and collaborating on Git repositories.
Features: Atom is known for its highly customizable interface, allowing users to tailor the editor to their specific coding preferences with a wide range of packages and themes. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers features catering to software development teams, such as code review tools, issue tracking, and seamless integration with Jira and other Atlassian products.
Collaboration: Atom is primarily a standalone text editor, designed for individual use without built-in collaboration features. On the contrary, Bitbucket is focused on facilitating teamwork and project collaboration, providing tools for version control, branch management, and pull requests.
Cost: Atom is an open-source project and is entirely free for users, with a strong community contributing to its development and support. In contrast, Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the free tier limited to a certain number of users and repositories, while the paid plans offer advanced features and increased storage capacity.
Deployment: Atom is a desktop application that needs to be installed on a local machine to use, offering offline functionality for coding on the go. In comparison, Bitbucket is a cloud-based service accessible through a web browser, allowing users to manage and collaborate on projects from any device with an internet connection.
Focus: Atom is focused on providing a streamlined coding experience with features like syntax highlighting, autocomplete, and multiple panes for multitasking, catering to individual developers. Meanwhile, Bitbucket targets software development teams by offering project management tools, pull request workflows, and integration with other Atlassian products to streamline the development process.

In Summary, Atom and Bitbucket differ in platform, features, collaboration capabilities, cost, deployment methods, and target audience, catering to individual developers and software development teams respectively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Atom

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Atom
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Atom is a desktop application based on web technologies;Node.js integration;Modular Design- composed of over 50 open-source packages that integrate around a minimal core;File system browser;Fuzzy finder for quickly opening files;Fast project-wide search and replace;Multiple cursors and selections;Multiple panes;Snippets;Code folding;A clean preferences UI;Import TextMate grammars and themes
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 60.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 17.3K
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 16.9K
Followers 33.4K	Followers 14.5K
Votes 2.8K	Votes 2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 529 Free 449 Open source 343 Modular design 321 Hackable 316 Beautiful UI Cons 19 Slow with large files 7 Slow startup 2 Most of the time packages are hard to find. 1 Cannot Run code with F5 1 No longer maintained
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Atom?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Related Comparisons

Atom vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Platform: Atom is a text editor developed by GitHub, while Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian. Atom is primarily used for programming and coding purposes, whereas Bitbucket is used for hosting and collaborating on Git repositories.
Features: Atom is known for its highly customizable interface, allowing users to tailor the editor to their specific coding preferences with a wide range of packages and themes. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers features catering to software development teams, such as code review tools, issue tracking, and seamless integration with Jira and other Atlassian products.
Collaboration: Atom is primarily a standalone text editor, designed for individual use without built-in collaboration features. On the contrary, Bitbucket is focused on facilitating teamwork and project collaboration, providing tools for version control, branch management, and pull requests.
Cost: Atom is an open-source project and is entirely free for users, with a strong community contributing to its development and support. In contrast, Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the free tier limited to a certain number of users and repositories, while the paid plans offer advanced features and increased storage capacity.
Deployment: Atom is a desktop application that needs to be installed on a local machine to use, offering offline functionality for coding on the go. In comparison, Bitbucket is a cloud-based service accessible through a web browser, allowing users to manage and collaborate on projects from any device with an internet connection.
Focus: Atom is focused on providing a streamlined coding experience with features like syntax highlighting, autocomplete, and multiple panes for multitasking, catering to individual developers. Meanwhile, Bitbucket targets software development teams by offering project management tools, pull request workflows, and integration with other Atlassian products to streamline the development process.

Atom vs Bitbucket

Overview