StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Arch Linux vs Debian

Arch Linux vs Debian

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Debian
Debian
Stacks16.4K
Followers11.2K
Votes164
Arch Linux
Arch Linux
Stacks562
Followers555
Votes108

Arch Linux vs Debian: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Arch Linux and Debian

Arch Linux and Debian are both popular Linux distributions, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Installation and Package Management: Arch Linux follows a DIY (Do It Yourself) approach, providing a minimal base system that allows users to customize their installation. The package manager, Pacman, is lightweight and simple, with a focus on minimalism. On the other hand, Debian offers a more user-friendly installation process and a robust package manager, APT (Advanced Package Tool), which provides a large repository of pre-compiled software packages.

  2. Release Model: Arch Linux follows a rolling release model, which means that there are no fixed release versions. Instead, packages are continuously updated, providing users with the latest software versions. In contrast, Debian follows a stable release model, where major versions are released periodically and are thoroughly tested for stability and reliability.

  3. Community Support: Arch Linux has a strong and active community that emphasizes a do-it-yourself mentality. The community-driven ArchWiki provides comprehensive documentation and guides for troubleshooting and customization. Debian also has a supportive community, but it focuses more on stability and long-term support, making it suitable for enterprise use.

  4. System Complexity: Arch Linux is known for its simplicity, offering minimal default installations and giving users full control over their system configuration. It provides a hands-on approach, requiring users to manually configure and set up their system. On the other hand, Debian aims for a more comprehensive out-of-the-box experience, with pre-configured defaults and extensive hardware support.

  5. Software Availability: Arch Linux offers a wide range of software packages, but the emphasis is on providing the latest versions rather than stability. This may sometimes result in bleeding-edge software that may not be as thoroughly tested. Debian, on the other hand, prioritizes stability over the latest versions and tends to have a more conservative approach, ensuring that software packages are thoroughly tested before being included in the repository.

  6. Ease of Use: While both distributions have their own learning curves, Debian is generally considered to be more user-friendly, especially for beginners. Its installation process and graphical interfaces make it easier to get started. Arch Linux, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of the Linux system and command-line interface, making it more suitable for users with intermediate or advanced knowledge.

In Summary, Arch Linux offers a minimalistic and customizable approach with a rolling release model, while Debian focuses on stability and ease of use with a more conservative release model. Both distributions have a strong community support system, but their target audience and system goals differ.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Debian, Arch Linux

Simon
Simon

Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.

299k views299k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Debian
Debian
Arch Linux
Arch Linux

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Statistics
Stacks
16.4K
Stacks
562
Followers
11.2K
Followers
555
Votes
164
Votes
108
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 54
    Massively supported
  • 50
    Stable
  • 21
    Reliable
  • 9
    Aptitude
  • 8
    Customizable
Cons
  • 10
    Old versions of software
  • 2
    Can be difficult to set up on vanilla Debian
Pros
  • 17
    Large Community
  • 15
    Package Manager
  • 13
    Customizable
  • 12
    Rolling Release
  • 11
    Arch User Repository
Cons
  • 4
    Systemd only
  • 3
    Only X86_64 architecture is offically supported
  • 1
    Unstable
  • 1
    System maintenance
  • 1
    No Guided Installation

What are some alternatives to Debian, Arch Linux?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

FreeBSD

FreeBSD

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase