StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Testing Frameworks
  5. Appium vs xctest

Appium vs xctest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K
xctest
xctest
Stacks15
Followers1
Votes0

Appium vs xctest: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of mobile app testing, both Appium and XCTest are widely used frameworks. Appium is an open-source automation tool that allows testing of mobile applications on various platforms, while XCTest is a testing framework developed by Apple specifically for iOS app testing.

  1. Compatibility: One key difference between Appium and XCTest is their compatibility. Appium supports testing across multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and Windows, whereas XCTest is limited to iOS platform only. Therefore, if you need to test your mobile app on multiple platforms, Appium would be a suitable choice.

  2. Language Support: Appium provides support for a wide range of programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and C#, making it a versatile automation tool. On the other hand, XCTest primarily supports Swift and Objective-C languages, which are the main programming languages used for iOS app development. So if you are familiar with Swift or Objective-C, XCTest might be more suitable for you.

  3. Test Development: Test development in Appium is done using a client-server architectural model, where the test scripts are written in a specific language and communicate with the Appium server to perform the desired actions on the mobile app. In contrast, XCTest follows a more traditional approach, allowing you to directly write test cases within Xcode, Apple's integrated development environment (IDE). This difference in test development approaches gives developers flexibility in choosing their preferred workflow.

  4. Debugging Capabilities: XCTest offers better debugging capabilities compared to Appium. As XCTest is tightly integrated with Xcode, it provides detailed logs and debugging features that help developers identify and resolve issues more efficiently. On the other hand, Appium's debugging capabilities are relatively limited, although it does provide basic logging functionalities.

  5. App Store Approval: Appium tests can be run on any device, which means they can automate actions that are not approved by the Apple App Store, such as installing third-party apps or interacting with system settings. On the contrary, XCTest follows the rules and restrictions imposed by Apple, ensuring that the tests adhere to the guidelines defined for app store submission. This makes XCTest a better choice if you want to ensure your app passes the review process without any issues.

  6. Community Support: Appium has a larger and more active community compared to XCTest. With a larger user base, Appium benefits from a wider range of resources, including documentation, tutorials, and community forums, making it easier for developers to find help and support when facing challenges. XCTest, being an Apple-developed framework, has a smaller community but can still rely on Apple's official documentation and developer resources.

In Summary, Appium offers cross-platform compatibility, wider language support, and flexibility in test development, while XCTest provides better debugging capabilities, adheres to App Store guidelines, and benefits from Apple's resources and documentation. The choice between Appium and XCTest depends on the specific requirements of your project, the platforms you need to support, and your familiarity with different programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appium
Appium
xctest
xctest

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

Tests assert that certain conditions are satisfied during code execution, and record test failures (with optional messages) if those conditions are not satisfied. Tests can also measure the performance of blocks of code.

Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
650
Stacks
15
Followers
574
Followers
1
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Active community
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Appium, xctest?

EarlGrey

EarlGrey

EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed.

Kobiton

Kobiton

It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.

Kiwi

Kiwi

It is a Behavior Driven Development library for iOS development. The goal is to provide a BDD library that is exquisitely simple to setup and use.

pCloudy

pCloudy

It is a smart mobile app testing solution that lets developers ensure their users enjoy a smooth and consistent experience. With it, developers can access manual and automated testing options to facilitate the swift debugging of their applications.

Magneto

Magneto

Magneto was built by Automation Engineers for Automation Engineers out of necessity for a mobile centric test automation framework that's easy to setup, run and utilize.

Experitest

Experitest

It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.

Apptim

Apptim

It empowers software testers, developers, and even product owners to easily test their mobile apps and analyze their performance to prevent any critical issues from going live. Measure app render times, power consumption, resource usage, capture crashes and more on Android and iOS devices.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot