Appium vs Ghost Inspector

Overview

Ghost Inspector

Stacks64

Followers117

Votes22

Appium

Stacks650

Followers574

Votes28

GitHub Stars20.8K

Forks6.2K

Appium vs Ghost Inspector: What are the differences?

Automation Type: Appium is primarily used for mobile automation testing, while Ghost Inspector is focused on web automation testing. Appium supports testing on a wide range of mobile devices and platforms, while Ghost Inspector is tailored for web applications across different browsers and environments.
Programming Language: Appium allows for test scripts to be written in multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, and Ruby, providing flexibility to the user. On the other hand, Ghost Inspector uses JavaScript for writing test scripts, which simplifies the learning curve for beginners and enables easier integration with web applications.
User Interface: Ghost Inspector offers a user-friendly web interface for creating and managing test suites, making it convenient for users without extensive technical knowledge to perform automation testing. In contrast, Appium requires users to set up test scripts using code and a specified development environment.
Execution Environment: Appium requires the setup of a testing environment that includes configuring settings for different devices, emulators, and simulators. Ghost Inspector, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based solution where tests can be run on their servers without the need for managing testing environments locally.
Reporting and Analysis: Appium provides detailed test reports and logs that enable users to analyze test results comprehensively. Ghost Inspector offers built-in reporting features that include screenshots and videos of test executions, enhancing the debugging process for identifying issues in web applications.

In Summary, Appium is geared towards mobile automation testing with support for various programming languages, while Ghost Inspector specializes in web automation testing with a user-friendly interface and cloud-based execution environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector	Appium
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.	Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option	Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 20.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 64	Stacks 650
Followers 117	Followers 574
Votes 22	Votes 28
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 No code required 3 Simple test editor 3 Runscope integration 2 Screenshot comparison 2 Videos of every test run Cons 1 Support Cross-device testing (device, web) 0 Flash Support inside browser 0 Load & Performance testing	Pros 12 Webdriverio support 6 Java, C#, Python support 3 Open source 2 Active community 2 Great GUI with inspector
Integrations
PagerDuty Runscope GitHub Heroku CircleCI Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Jenkins Slack HipChat	Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Appium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

Appium vs Ghost Inspector: What are the differences?

Automation Type: Appium is primarily used for mobile automation testing, while Ghost Inspector is focused on web automation testing. Appium supports testing on a wide range of mobile devices and platforms, while Ghost Inspector is tailored for web applications across different browsers and environments.
Programming Language: Appium allows for test scripts to be written in multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, and Ruby, providing flexibility to the user. On the other hand, Ghost Inspector uses JavaScript for writing test scripts, which simplifies the learning curve for beginners and enables easier integration with web applications.
User Interface: Ghost Inspector offers a user-friendly web interface for creating and managing test suites, making it convenient for users without extensive technical knowledge to perform automation testing. In contrast, Appium requires users to set up test scripts using code and a specified development environment.
Execution Environment: Appium requires the setup of a testing environment that includes configuring settings for different devices, emulators, and simulators. Ghost Inspector, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based solution where tests can be run on their servers without the need for managing testing environments locally.
Reporting and Analysis: Appium provides detailed test reports and logs that enable users to analyze test results comprehensively. Ghost Inspector offers built-in reporting features that include screenshots and videos of test executions, enhancing the debugging process for identifying issues in web applications.

Appium vs Ghost Inspector

Overview