StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Testing Frameworks
  5. Appium vs Calabash

Appium vs Calabash

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K
Calabash
Calabash
Stacks8
Followers9
Votes0

Appium vs Calabash: What are the differences?

Introduction

Appium and Calabash are both popular open-source frameworks used for mobile app testing. While they have similarities, there are also key differences between them that make each unique in their own way.

  1. Development Language: Appium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, C#, Ruby, Python, etc., providing flexibility to developers with different language preferences. On the other hand, Calabash primarily supports Ruby, making it an ideal choice for Ruby developers or teams that heavily use Ruby in their development stack.

  2. Platform Support: Appium offers broader platform support, allowing tests to be run on iOS, Android, and even Windows platforms. It provides seamless cross-platform testing capabilities, making it suitable for teams working on multiple platforms. In contrast, Calabash mainly focuses on iOS and Android, limiting its cross-platform compatibility.

  3. Community and Support: Appium has a larger and more active community, which means more support, frequent updates, and extensive documentation. It is backed by Sauce Labs, a well-known company in the field of testing automation. Calabash, while also having a strong community, may not have the same level of support or resources available, making it preferable for teams who are more self-sufficient.

  4. Testing Approach: Appium follows a standard Selenium-based approach, leveraging WebDriver APIs to interact with mobile apps. This makes it easier for testers and developers already familiar with Selenium to transition into mobile app testing. Calabash, on the other hand, uses a declarative user interface query syntax and steps written in plain English, making it more accessible to non-technical team members such as product owners or business analysts.

  5. Integration with Continuous Integration: Appium integrates smoothly with popular Continuous Integration (CI) tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Bitrise, allowing for easy integration into the existing CI/CD pipelines. Calabash, while also having CI integration, may require additional configuration or setup compared to Appium.

  6. Native Automation Libraries: Appium relies on the WebDriver API for automation, which means it can directly use the native automation libraries provided by Android and iOS platforms. This allows for more precise and accurate automation of native features and interactions. Calabash, on the other hand, relies on UI Automation (for iOS) and UI Automator (for Android) frameworks, which may have some limitations or restrictions when compared to the native automation libraries.

In summary, the key differences between Appium and Calabash lie in their development language support, platform compatibility, community and support, testing approach, integration with CI, and the use of native automation libraries. Depending on the requirements and preferences of the team or organization, either framework can be the best choice for mobile app testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appium
Appium
Calabash
Calabash

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

Calabash-iOS and Calabash-Android are the underlying low-level libraries that empower the Cucumber tool to run automated functional tests on Android and iOS phones and tablets as well as on simulators. These low-level libraries enable QA, business staff and developers to work at a high level by writing tests in a natural language using the terms and concepts of their business domain.

Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
650
Stacks
8
Followers
574
Followers
9
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Active community
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Appium, Calabash?

EarlGrey

EarlGrey

EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed.

Kobiton

Kobiton

It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.

Kiwi

Kiwi

It is a Behavior Driven Development library for iOS development. The goal is to provide a BDD library that is exquisitely simple to setup and use.

pCloudy

pCloudy

It is a smart mobile app testing solution that lets developers ensure their users enjoy a smooth and consistent experience. With it, developers can access manual and automated testing options to facilitate the swift debugging of their applications.

Magneto

Magneto

Magneto was built by Automation Engineers for Automation Engineers out of necessity for a mobile centric test automation framework that's easy to setup, run and utilize.

Experitest

Experitest

It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.

Apptim

Apptim

It empowers software testers, developers, and even product owners to easily test their mobile apps and analyze their performance to prevent any critical issues from going live. Measure app render times, power consumption, resource usage, capture crashes and more on Android and iOS devices.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot