StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Apigility vs Expressive

Apigility vs Expressive

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apigility
Apigility
Stacks37
Followers105
Votes2
GitHub Stars442
Forks118
Expressive
Expressive
Stacks12
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars737
Forks210

Apigility vs Expressive: What are the differences?

  1. API Design and Feature Set: Apigility is a tool specifically designed for creating APIs, offering features like API validation, documentation, versioning, and content negotiation out of the box. In contrast, Expressive is a microframework designed for building web applications, providing more flexibility in terms of application structure and features beyond just APIs.

  2. Dependency Injection Container: Apigility uses Zend Service Manager for dependency injection, which is tightly integrated into the framework. Expressive, on the other hand, allows developers to choose their preferred dependency injection container, offering more flexibility and control over the application's dependencies.

  3. Middleware Approach: Expressive follows a middleware approach where each component in the application pipeline is responsible for a specific task, leading to a more modular and composable architecture. In comparison, Apigility follows a more traditional MVC pattern, where controllers handle the request-response cycle, limiting the flexibility in how components can interact.

  4. Community Support and Ecosystem: As part of the Zend Framework ecosystem, Apigility benefits from a large and established community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. Expressive, being a standalone microframework, has a smaller community but offers more opportunities for customization and experimentation with different libraries and tools.

  5. Handling Route Definitions: Apigility uses a visual interface for defining and managing API routes, making it easier for developers to create and modify endpoints without manually editing configuration files. Expressive utilizes configuration-based route definitions, which offer more granular control over routing and can be beneficial for complex application routing requirements.

  6. Project Scope and Usage: Apigility is best suited for projects focused solely on creating APIs, offering a streamlined approach to API development with built-in functionality for common API features. Expressive, on the other hand, is ideal for projects requiring more flexibility and customization beyond just API development, allowing developers to build a variety of web applications.

In Summary, Apigility is tailored for API development with specific features and a visual interface, while Expressive provides greater flexibility in application structure, middleware approach, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apigility
Apigility
Expressive
Expressive

An API-based architecture is essential to agile delivery of mobile applications. Apigility provides JSON representations that can be parsed and used in any mobile framework; write for the web or native applications simultaneously!

Make your code flexible and robust, using the dependency injection container of your choice.

RESTful or RPC services; JSON (specifically, HAL); Problem Details for HTTP APIs; Versioning; Normalisation and Validation; Authentication (HTTP Basic/Digest, OAuth2); Documentation (HTML, Swagger).
PSR-15 and PSR-7; Routing; Dependency Injection Templating
Statistics
GitHub Stars
442
GitHub Stars
737
GitHub Forks
118
GitHub Forks
210
Stacks
37
Stacks
12
Followers
105
Followers
12
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Follows Standards, Easy to Use, Design Patterns Used
  • 1
    Active dev community, full-featured, REST + RPC
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Vagrant
Vagrant
Docker
Docker
NGINX
NGINX
Moesif
Moesif
API Plug
API Plug

What are some alternatives to Apigility, Expressive?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp