StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Stream Processing
  5. Apache Storm vs Heron

Apache Storm vs Heron

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Storm
Apache Storm
Stacks208
Followers282
Votes25
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks4.1K
Heron
Heron
Stacks22
Followers63
Votes4

Apache Storm vs Heron: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Storm and Heron are both open-source distributed stream processing systems used for real-time analytics and data processing. While they have similar functionalities, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Scalability: Apache Storm is designed to run on a cluster of machines, which can be scaled horizontally to handle large workloads. On the other hand, Heron is built with scalability in mind from the ground up, allowing it to handle massive amounts of data more efficiently.

  2. Performance: Heron achieves better performance compared to Apache Storm due to its more efficient and optimized runtime. Heron's architecture allows for lower latency and higher throughput, making it ideal for latency-sensitive applications.

  3. Fault-tolerance and Reliability: Apache Storm uses the concept of "acknowledgments" to ensure reliability and fault-tolerance. However, this approach can sometimes lead to over-acknowledgment and additional overhead. In contrast, Heron introduces the concept of "exactly-once processing" which ensures end-to-end reliability without requiring explicit acknowledgments.

  4. Ease of Use and Development: Apache Storm provides a relatively simpler programming model as compared to Heron, making it more suitable for beginners and developers who prefer a straightforward approach. However, Heron offers a more advanced programming model and a more extensible API, allowing developers to build more complex stream processing applications.

  5. Operational Management: Apache Storm lacks built-in operational tools for managing and monitoring running topologies. However, Heron includes a wide range of operational tools like an interactive dashboard, metrics collection, and distributed tracing, making it easier to monitor, debug, and manage the execution of streaming applications.

  6. Community and Support: Apache Storm has been around for longer and has a larger community of users and contributors, resulting in a larger ecosystem of libraries, connectors, and resources. Heron, being a more recent project, has a smaller but growing community, with a focus on performance and innovation.

In Summary, Apache Storm and Heron differ in terms of scalability, performance, fault-tolerance, ease of use, operational management, and community support. While Storm offers simplicity and a mature ecosystem, Heron excels in scalability, performance, and operational tooling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Storm
Apache Storm
Heron
Heron

Apache Storm is a free and open source distributed realtime computation system. Storm makes it easy to reliably process unbounded streams of data, doing for realtime processing what Hadoop did for batch processing. Storm has many use cases: realtime analytics, online machine learning, continuous computation, distributed RPC, ETL, and more. Storm is fast: a benchmark clocked it at over a million tuples processed per second per node. It is scalable, fault-tolerant, guarantees your data will be processed, and is easy to set up and operate.

Heron is realtime analytics platform developed by Twitter. It is the direct successor of Apache Storm, built to be backwards compatible with Storm's topology API but with a wide array of architectural improvements.

Storm integrates with the queueing and database technologies you already use;Simple API;Scalable;Fault tolerant;Guarantees data processing;Use with any language;Easy to deploy and operate;Free and open source
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
208
Stacks
22
Followers
282
Followers
63
Votes
25
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Flexible
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Event Processing
  • 3
    Clojure
  • 2
    Real Time
Pros
  • 1
    Realtime Stream Processing
  • 1
    Support most popular container environment
  • 1
    Operation friendly
  • 1
    Highly Customizable

What are some alternatives to Apache Storm, Heron?

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Confluent

Confluent

It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

KSQL

KSQL

KSQL is an open source streaming SQL engine for Apache Kafka. It provides a simple and completely interactive SQL interface for stream processing on Kafka; no need to write code in a programming language such as Java or Python. KSQL is open-source (Apache 2.0 licensed), distributed, scalable, reliable, and real-time.

Kafka Streams

Kafka Streams

It is a client library for building applications and microservices, where the input and output data are stored in Kafka clusters. It combines the simplicity of writing and deploying standard Java and Scala applications on the client side with the benefits of Kafka's server-side cluster technology.

Kapacitor

Kapacitor

It is a native data processing engine for InfluxDB 1.x and is an integrated component in the InfluxDB 2.0 platform. It can process both stream and batch data from InfluxDB, acting on this data in real-time via its programming language TICKscript.

Redpanda

Redpanda

It is a streaming platform for mission critical workloads. Kafka® compatible, No Zookeeper®, no JVM, and no code changes required. Use all your favorite open source tooling - 10x faster.

Faust

Faust

It is a stream processing library, porting the ideas from Kafka Streams to Python. It provides both stream processing and event processing, sharing similarity with tools such as Kafka Streams, Apache Spark/Storm/Samza/Flink.

Samza

Samza

It allows you to build stateful applications that process data in real-time from multiple sources including Apache Kafka.

Benthos

Benthos

It is a high performance and resilient stream processor, able to connect various sources and sinks in a range of brokering patterns and perform hydration, enrichments, transformations and filters on payloads.

Amazon WorkSpaces Streaming Protocol

Amazon WorkSpaces Streaming Protocol

It is a cloud-native streaming protocol that enables a consistent user experience when accessing your end user’s WorkSpaces across global distances and unreliable networks. It also enables additional features such as the beta feature of bi-directional video. As a cloud-native protocol, it delivers feature and performance enhancements without manual updates on your WorkSpaces.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase