StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache NiFi vs CDAP

Apache NiFi vs CDAP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CDAP
CDAP
Stacks41
Followers108
Votes0
Apache NiFi
Apache NiFi
Stacks393
Followers692
Votes65

Apache NiFi vs CDAP: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache NiFi and CDAP are two popular data integration and data processing platforms used in big data environments. While both platforms offer similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Scalability: Apache NiFi is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large volumes of data processing and integration tasks. It can be deployed in clustered environments to distribute the workload, ensuring high performance. On the other hand, CDAP also supports scalability to some extent, but it is more focused on providing a cohesive development and management environment for data applications.

  2. Data ingestion and routing: Apache NiFi provides a user-friendly interface for configuring data ingestion and routing flows. It offers a wide range of processors and connectors to interact with various data sources and destinations. CDAP also supports data ingestion and routing, but it primarily focuses on providing an application development framework rather than a visual interface for configuring data flows.

  3. Data transformation and processing: Apache NiFi allows users to easily transform and process data using its built-in processors and integration capabilities. It supports various data transformation operations such as filtering, enrichment, and aggregation. CDAP also offers data transformation and processing capabilities, but it provides a more extensive set of data processing frameworks and libraries, making it suitable for complex data processing tasks.

  4. Data governance and security: Apache NiFi provides robust data governance and security features. It offers role-based access control, data provenance tracking, and encryption capabilities to ensure data security and compliance. CDAP also offers data governance and security features, but it focuses more on providing a unified environment for managing data applications rather than specific security features.

  5. Integration with external systems: Apache NiFi offers extensive integration capabilities with various external systems and technologies. It supports integration with messaging systems, databases, cloud storage, and many other platforms. CDAP also provides integration capabilities with external systems, but it primarily focuses on integrating with Hadoop ecosystem components such as HDFS, Hive, and HBase.

  6. Community and ecosystem: Apache NiFi has a large and active community of users and contributors, which ensures continuous development and improvement of the platform. It has a rich ecosystem of extensions and plugins that provide additional functionality and integration options. CDAP also has a growing community, but its ecosystem is not as extensive as Apache NiFi's. However, CDAP benefits from the close integration with the larger Hadoop ecosystem.

In summary, Apache NiFi and CDAP are both powerful data integration and processing platforms with their own unique strengths. Apache NiFi excels in scalability, data ingestion, and user-friendly data transformation, while CDAP focuses more on providing a cohesive development environment and integration with the Hadoop ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CDAP
CDAP
Apache NiFi
Apache NiFi

Cask Data Application Platform (CDAP) is an open source application development platform for the Hadoop ecosystem that provides developers with data and application virtualization to accelerate application development, address a broader range of real-time and batch use cases, and deploy applications into production while satisfying enterprise requirements.

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Streams for data ingestion;Reusable libraries for common Big Data access patterns;Data available to multiple applications and different paradigms;Framework level guarantees;Full development lifecycle and production deployment;Standardization of applications across programming paradigms
Web-based user interface; Highly configurable; Data Provenance; Designed for extension; Secure
Statistics
Stacks
41
Stacks
393
Followers
108
Followers
692
Votes
0
Votes
65
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 17
    Visual Data Flows using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)
  • 8
    Free (Open Source)
  • 7
    Simple-to-use
  • 5
    Reactive with back-pressure
  • 5
    Scalable horizontally as well as vertically
Cons
  • 2
    Memory-intensive
  • 2
    HA support is not full fledge
  • 1
    Kkk
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
MongoDB
MongoDB
Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Linux
Linux
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Kafka
Kafka
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to CDAP, Apache NiFi?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase