StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs Websphere Liberty

Apache HTTP Server vs Websphere Liberty

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
Websphere Liberty
Websphere Liberty
Stacks39
Followers93
Votes0

Apache HTTP Server vs Websphere Liberty: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of web servers, Apache HTTP Server and Websphere Liberty are two popular choices. However, they differ in various aspects that cater to different needs and requirements of users and developers. Let's explore the key differences between Apache HTTP Server and Websphere Liberty.

  1. Architecture: Apache HTTP Server is an open-source, highly extensible web server that follows a modular architecture allowing users to plug in various modules based on their requirements. On the other hand, Websphere Liberty is a lightweight and flexible Java EE application server that follows a microservices architecture and is designed for cloud-native applications, providing features like dynamic scaling and easy deployment of microservices.

  2. Scalability: Apache HTTP Server is known for its scalability and can handle a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently. It is often used in high-traffic websites and applications. Websphere Liberty, on the other hand, is designed for scalability in cloud environments, offering features like dynamic clustering and auto-scaling to handle varying workloads and ensure high availability.

  3. Administration: Apache HTTP Server is commonly configured and managed through configuration files, requiring some level of manual intervention for updates and maintenance. In contrast, Websphere Liberty provides a more user-friendly administration console that allows users to easily manage and monitor the server, applications, and resources, making it easier for developers and administrators to handle various tasks.

  4. Supported Technologies: Apache HTTP Server primarily supports technologies like PHP, Perl, and Python, making it a versatile choice for hosting various types of websites and applications. Websphere Liberty, on the other hand, is specifically built for Java EE applications and provides comprehensive support for Java technologies, making it an ideal choice for enterprises working with Java applications and services.

  5. Commercial Support: While Apache HTTP Server is free and open-source with a vast community of users providing support, commercial support options are available through third-party vendors. Websphere Liberty, being a part of IBM's Websphere family, offers commercial support directly from IBM, providing users with access to professional support services, patches, and updates tailored to enterprise needs.

In Summary, Apache HTTP Server and Websphere Liberty differ in terms of architecture, scalability, administration, supported technologies, and commercial support, catering to different user requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Websphere Liberty

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Websphere Liberty
Websphere Liberty

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

It is very lightweight profile of WebSphere Application Server. It is a flexible and dynamic profile of WAS which enables the WAS server to deploy only required custom features instead of deploying a big set of available JEE components.

-
lightweight profile; deploy only required custom features
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
39
Followers
22.8K
Followers
93
Votes
1.4K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Chef
Chef
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Websphere Liberty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase