Apache HTTP Server vs Uvicorn

Overview

Apache HTTP Server

Stacks64.5K

Followers22.8K

Votes1.4K

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks1.2K

Uvicorn

Stacks168

Followers119

Votes0

Apache HTTP Server vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache HTTP Server and Uvicorn

The Apache HTTP Server and Uvicorn are two widely used web servers that have some key differences. Here are the main distinctions between the two:

Architecture:

Apache HTTP Server is based on a multi-process model where multiple processes are spawned to handle incoming requests. Each process can handle multiple connections simultaneously. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is based on an asynchronous single-threaded architecture utilizing asyncio. It can handle thousands of connections concurrently using a single thread.

Protocol Support:

Apache HTTP Server supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. It can also proxy requests for protocols like WebSocket and FastCGI. Uvicorn mainly focuses on HTTP and WebSocket protocols, providing high-performance web application serving.

Web Framework Integration:

Apache HTTP Server supports various web frameworks through its modular architecture and can serve applications written in different languages like PHP, Python, and more. Uvicorn is primarily designed for integrating with Python web frameworks like Django, Flask, and Starlette.

Concurrency Model:

Apache HTTP Server uses a process-based concurrency model where each process handles multiple connections using threads. Uvicorn utilizes an event-driven concurrency model with an asynchronous programming paradigm, which allows it to handle many connections simultaneously with minimal resource consumption.

Performance:

Apache HTTP Server has a proven track record of being highly scalable and capable of handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. Uvicorn, being based on an asynchronous architecture, offers higher performance and better resource utilization for handling multiple concurrent connections.

Ease of Deployment and Configuration:

Apache HTTP Server has a long-standing reputation for its ease of deployment and flexible configuration options. Uvicorn, being a Python-specific web server, is relatively easier to configure and deploy for Python web applications.

In summary, Apache HTTP Server and Uvicorn differ in architecture, protocol support, web framework integration, concurrency model, performance, and ease of deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Uvicorn

Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
Install apache and tomcat.
Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
Create users on RHEL for application support team.
other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k

Comments

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server	Uvicorn
The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.	It is a lightning-fast ASGI server, built on uvloop and httptools. Until recently Python has lacked a minimal low-level server/application interface for asyncio frameworks. The ASGI specification fills this gap, and means we're now able to start building a common set of tooling usable across all asyncio frameworks.
-	ASGI server implementation; Supports HTTP/1.1 and WebSockets; Support for HTTP/2 is planned
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 64.5K	Stacks 168
Followers 22.8K	Followers 119
Votes 1.4K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 479 Web server 305 Most widely-used web server 217 Virtual hosting 148 Fast 138 Ssl support Cons 4 Hard to set up	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Python

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Uvicorn?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Apache HTTP Server vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache HTTP Server and Uvicorn

The Apache HTTP Server and Uvicorn are two widely used web servers that have some key differences. Here are the main distinctions between the two:

Architecture:

Protocol Support:

Web Framework Integration:

Concurrency Model:

Performance:

Ease of Deployment and Configuration:

In summary, Apache HTTP Server and Uvicorn differ in architecture, protocol support, web framework integration, concurrency model, performance, and ease of deployment.