Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache HTTP Server vs Oracle Weblogic Server: What are the differences?
Introduction
In the world of web servers and application servers, Apache HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server are two popular options. While both serve the purpose of processing and delivering web content, there are key differences that set them apart. This article will highlight six of these key differences between Apache HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server.
1. Scalability and Performance:
Apache HTTP Server is known for its high scalability and performance. It is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections and efficiently serve static content. On the other hand, Oracle Weblogic Server is specifically tailored for enterprise-level applications and is capable of handling heavy workloads, including dynamic content generation and server-side processing.
2. Feature Set:
Apache HTTP Server is an open-source server that provides a wide range of features, including virtual hosting, proxying, caching, and URL rewriting. It also supports a variety of modules that can be extended to enhance its functionality. Oracle Weblogic Server, on the other hand, is a commercial application server that comes with a comprehensive set of features specifically designed for enterprise applications, such as transaction management, clustering, and high availability.
3. Integration Capabilities:
Apache HTTP Server is often used as a front-end server, working in conjunction with other web servers or application servers. It can be easily integrated with different technologies and platforms, making it a popular choice for building flexible and scalable web infrastructures. Oracle Weblogic Server, being a full-fledged application server, provides built-in integration capabilities for various enterprise technologies, such as Java Enterprise Edition, messaging systems, and database connectivity.
4. Administration and Management:
Apache HTTP Server focuses on simplicity and ease of administration. It offers a lightweight and straightforward management interface that allows administrators to configure and monitor the server easily. On the other hand, Oracle Weblogic Server provides a comprehensive management console with extensive administrative capabilities. It includes features like centralized configuration, monitoring, and deployment management, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments.
5. Security Features:
Apache HTTP Server provides a range of security features, including SSL/TLS encryption, access control, and module-based security enhancements. It also benefits from continuous community-driven development and patching, ensuring timely security updates. Oracle Weblogic Server, being an enterprise-level application server, offers advanced security features like secure inter-server communication, fine-grained application access control, and centralized security management.
6. Licensing and Support:
Apache HTTP Server is an open-source software released under the Apache License, making it freely available for use and modification. It is supported by a vast community of developers and users, offering a wide range of resources and support options. Oracle Weblogic Server, being a commercial product, requires a paid license and provides official technical support from Oracle. This licensing and support model may be a crucial consideration for organizations with specific needs or legal requirements.
In Summary,
Apache HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server differ in scalability, feature set, integration capabilities, administration, security features, and licensing/support. Understanding these differences is essential in making an informed decision when selecting the appropriate web or application server for specific use cases.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of Apache HTTP Server
- Web server479
- Most widely-used web server305
- Virtual hosting217
- Fast148
- Ssl support138
- Since 199644
- Asynchronous28
- Robust5
- Proven over many years4
- Mature2
- Perfomance2
- Perfect Support1
- Many available modules0
- Many available modules0
Pros of Oracle Weblogic Server
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache HTTP Server
- Hard to set up4
