StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs NGINX Unit vs nginx

Apache HTTP Server vs NGINX Unit vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365

Apache HTTP Server vs NGINX Unit vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache HTTP Server is a widely used open-source web server software that is developed and maintained by the Apache Software Foundation. It is known for its stability, security, and modularity. On the other hand, NGINX Unit is a multi-language application server that is designed to run applications in various programming languages. It provides a flexible and dynamic platform for hosting apps, supporting both traditional and microservices architectures. NGINX, the parent company of NGINX Unit, is also known for its high-performance web server software.

1. Flexibility:

Apache HTTP Server has a modular architecture that allows users to install and configure additional modules to add functionality as needed. This flexibility makes it suitable for a wide range of use cases and allows users to customize their server setup to meet specific requirements. In contrast, NGINX Unit provides built-in support for multiple languages and frameworks without the need for additional modules, making it easier and faster to set up and deploy applications.

2. Performance:

NGINX Unit is known for its high-performance capabilities, especially when it comes to handling a large number of concurrent connections. It uses an event-driven, non-blocking architecture that allows it to efficiently handle many connections simultaneously, making it well-suited for high-traffic websites and applications. Apache HTTP Server, while still capable of handling a considerable amount of traffic, may not be as performant in scenarios with a high number of concurrent connections.

3. Ease of Use:

Apache HTTP Server has been around for a long time and has a large user community, which means there is more documentation, resources, and support available. It has a well-established configuration file format and a wide range of tools and utilities for managing and monitoring server instances. NGINX Unit, being a newer project, may have a slightly steeper learning curve for users who are new to NGINX or its specific configuration and management techniques.

4. Scalability:

NGINX Unit is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to easily scale their application deployments horizontally by adding more instances of NGINX Unit. It also supports automatic service discovery and load balancing, making it easier to scale and distribute traffic across multiple instances. Apache HTTP Server, while still capable of handling large loads, may require additional configurations or third-party tools for achieving the same level of scalability and load balancing.

5. Platform Support:

Apache HTTP Server is a cross-platform web server that can run on various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and various Unix variants. It has a wide range of modules and extensions available, making it compatible with different software stacks and technologies. NGINX Unit, on the other hand, currently supports Linux-based operating systems, which limits its deployment options for users on other platforms.

6. Community Support:

Apache HTTP Server has a large and active user community, which means there are many resources, forums, and communities where users can seek help, share knowledge, and collaborate on development. NGINX Unit, being a relatively newer project, may have a smaller community size in comparison. This can impact the availability of resources and support for users who may encounter issues or need assistance with their deployments.

Summary

In summary, the key differences between Apache HTTP Server and NGINX Unit are their flexibility, performance, ease of use, scalability, platform support, and community support. Apache HTTP Server is known for its modularity and wide user community, while NGINX Unit provides built-in language support and high-performance capabilities. Choosing between the two depends on specific use cases and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, NGINX, NGINX Unit

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Grant
Grant

Developer at GMS LLC

Sep 5, 2020

Decided
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
429k views429k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
NGINX
NGINX
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

--
Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
365
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
86
Followers
22.8K
Followers
61.9K
Followers
199
Votes
1.4K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Python
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 1
    Node.js
Integrations
No integrations availableNo integrations available
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, NGINX, NGINX Unit?

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase