StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs Microsoft IIS vs Passenger

Apache HTTP Server vs Microsoft IIS vs Passenger

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
Passenger
Passenger
Stacks1.4K
Followers298
Votes199
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks557
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236

Apache HTTP Server vs Microsoft IIS vs Passenger: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When considering which web server software to use, it's important to understand the key differences between Apache HTTP Server, Microsoft IIS, and Passenger. Each of these web servers has its own sets of strengths and weaknesses that can impact the performance and functionality of your website.

1. **Operating Systems Support**: Apache HTTP Server is known for its cross-platform compatibility, supporting various operating systems such as Linux, Windows, and macOS. In contrast, Microsoft IIS is specifically designed to run on Windows operating systems, limiting its deployment options. Passenger, on the other hand, provides support for both Apache and Nginx web servers.

2. **Configuration and Management**: Apache HTTP Server offers a rich set of configuration options through its .htaccess files, providing flexibility and fine-tuning capabilities. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, relies on the graphical user interface (GUI) for configuration, making it more user-friendly for beginners. Passenger simplifies the configuration process by automatically detecting and utilizing available resources, reducing the need for manual adjustments.

3. **Performance and Scalability**: Apache HTTP Server is renowned for its scalability and ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. Microsoft IIS is known for its integration with other Microsoft products and services, streamlining the deployment of .NET applications. Passenger optimizes server performance by utilizing process isolation and smart load balancing techniques, enhancing scalability and responsiveness.

4. **Modules and Extensions**: Apache HTTP Server boasts a vast repository of modules and extensions, allowing users to extend the functionality and capabilities of the web server. Microsoft IIS offers a selection of modules tailored to the Windows environment, focusing on integration with Microsoft technologies. Passenger provides a curated list of modules that are optimized for performance and compatibility with Ruby, Python, Node.js, and other programming languages.

5. **Security Features**: Apache HTTP Server includes built-in security features such as SSL/TLS support, authentication mechanisms, and access control options to protect websites from security threats. Microsoft IIS offers robust security features like request filtering, IP address restrictions, and advanced encryption protocols to ensure data protection. Passenger enhances security by isolating application processes and implementing sandboxing techniques to mitigate vulnerabilities.

6. **Community Support and Updates**: Apache HTTP Server benefits from a large community of developers and users, providing comprehensive documentation, online forums, and frequent updates to address bugs and security issues. Microsoft IIS offers official support from Microsoft, ensuring timely updates, patches, and technical assistance. Passenger relies on a dedicated team of developers and contributors to maintain the project, offering continuous improvements and support for the user community.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Apache HTTP Server, Microsoft IIS, and Passenger is crucial for choosing the right web server software that aligns with your website's requirements and infrastructure. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Passenger, Microsoft IIS

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Passenger
Passenger
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
557
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
15.5K
Followers
22.8K
Followers
298
Followers
7.7K
Votes
1.4K
Votes
199
Votes
236
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 43
    Nginx integration
  • 36
    Great for rails
  • 21
    Fast web server
  • 19
    Free
  • 15
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 0
    Cost (some features require paid/pro)
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Integrations
No integrations available
NGINX
NGINX
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Node.js
Node.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Passenger, Microsoft IIS?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Cowboy

Cowboy

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase