StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs Jetty

Apache HTTP Server vs Jetty

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47

Apache HTTP Server vs Jetty: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web development, choosing a suitable web server is crucial for the performance and reliability of a website. Two commonly used web servers are Apache HTTP Server and Jetty. While both servers serve the purpose of hosting websites, there are several key differences between them. Let's explore six specific differences between Apache HTTP Server and Jetty.

  1. Architecture and Design: Apache HTTP Server follows a traditional, process-based architecture where each client request is processed by a new process or thread. On the other hand, Jetty follows a lightweight, event-driven architecture where multiple client requests can be handled concurrently by a single thread using non-blocking I/O. This design choice makes Jetty more efficient in high-concurrency scenarios.

  2. Memory Footprint: Apache HTTP Server, being more mature and feature-rich, generally requires more system resources compared to Jetty. Due to its lightweight and modular design, Jetty has a smaller memory footprint, making it a suitable choice for resource-constrained environments or applications requiring higher scalability.

  3. Configuration and Extensibility: Apache HTTP Server provides a modular architecture with extensive configuration options through its powerful configuration file, .htaccess. It supports numerous modules for authentication, caching, URL rewriting, and more. Jetty, on the other hand, offers a more streamlined configuration and extensibility through its embedded API. It allows developers to customize the server with specific components based on their needs.

  4. Embedded Usage: Jetty is often used as an embedded server within Java applications, providing developers with the capability to launch and manage a web server programmatically. Apache HTTP Server is primarily designed as a standalone server, making it more suitable for traditional web hosting environments.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Apache HTTP Server has a large and vibrant community due to its long-standing presence and wide adoption. It has an extensive ecosystem of plugins, tools, and resources available for developers. Jetty, although having a smaller community, is known for its active and responsive community that focuses on delivering high-quality support and documentation.

  6. Performance and Scalability: Apache HTTP Server is renowned for its stability and capable of handling heavy workloads efficiently. However, Jetty's lightweight architecture and non-blocking I/O make it highly performant and scalable, particularly in scenarios where handling a large number of concurrent connections is critical.

In summary, Apache HTTP Server offers a mature and feature-rich solution with a larger community and extensive plugin ecosystem. On the other hand, Jetty provides a lightweight, scalable, and efficient server suitable for embedded usage and high-concurrency scenarios. The choice between Apache HTTP Server and Jetty ultimately depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the web application being developed.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Jetty

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Jetty
Jetty

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

-
Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
510
Followers
22.8K
Followers
311
Votes
1.4K
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Very thin
  • 6
    Scalable
Cons
  • 0
    Student

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Jetty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase