Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss

Overview

Apache HTTP Server

Stacks64.5K

Followers22.8K

Votes1.4K

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks1.2K

JBoss

Stacks457

Followers255

Votes0

Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache HTTP Server and JBoss

Apache HTTP Server and JBoss are both popular web server software solutions, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

Architecture and Purpose:
- Apache HTTP Server is a simple and lightweight web server designed primarily to serve static content efficiently. It follows a modular architecture and can be extended using various modules for additional functionality.
- JBoss, on the other hand, is a full-fledged application server that provides a comprehensive platform for developing, deploying, and hosting Java-based enterprise applications. It includes support for Java EE (Enterprise Edition) standards and offers features like clustering, caching, and load balancing.
Supported Technologies:
- Apache HTTP Server supports various standard web technologies like HTTP, SSL, and CGI. It can also integrate with PHP, Perl, and other scripting languages.
- JBoss, being an application server, supports a wide range of technologies beyond just HTTP. It provides support for Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs), Java Message Service (JMS), and other Java EE technologies.
Deployment and Maintenance:
- Apache HTTP Server is relatively easier to deploy and maintain as compared to JBoss. Since it is a lightweight server, it requires fewer resources and has a smaller footprint. It is commonly used in scenarios where simplicity and performance are paramount.
- JBoss, being an application server, requires more effort and resources for deployment and maintenance. It has a larger footprint and offers more complex configuration options. It is suitable for enterprise-level applications that require extensive features and scalability.
Clustering and High Availability:
- Apache HTTP Server does not natively support clustering and high availability features. However, it can be combined with other technologies like load balancers to achieve similar functionality.
- JBoss provides built-in support for clustering and high availability. It allows multiple instances of the application server to work together, providing failover and load balancing capabilities.
Community and Support:
- Apache HTTP Server has a large and active community of developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support. It has been around for a long time and has a vast amount of documentation and resources available.
- JBoss, being part of the Red Hat family, has its own dedicated community and support infrastructure. It is backed by a professional and commercial entity, providing enterprise-level support and additional features.
Licensing:
- Apache HTTP Server is open-source software released under the Apache License 2.0. It allows users to modify and distribute the software freely.
- JBoss, being a Red Hat product, is released under various licenses depending on the edition. The community edition (WildFly) is open-source and free, while the Red Hat Enterprise Edition requires a commercial license.

In summary, Apache HTTP Server is a lightweight web server focused on serving static content efficiently, while JBoss is a full-fledged application server designed for enterprise-level Java applications. Apache HTTP Server is easier to deploy and maintain, while JBoss offers more extensive features and support for various Java EE technologies. JBoss also provides built-in clustering and high availability capabilities, while Apache HTTP Server requires additional technologies for similar functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, JBoss

Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
Install apache and tomcat.
Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
Create users on RHEL for application support team.
other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k

Comments

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server	JBoss
The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.	An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 64.5K	Stacks 457
Followers 22.8K	Followers 255
Votes 1.4K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 479 Web server 305 Most widely-used web server 217 Virtual hosting 148 Fast 138 Ssl support Cons 4 Hard to set up	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, JBoss?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache HTTP Server and JBoss

Apache HTTP Server and JBoss are both popular web server software solutions, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

Architecture and Purpose:
- Apache HTTP Server is a simple and lightweight web server designed primarily to serve static content efficiently. It follows a modular architecture and can be extended using various modules for additional functionality.
- JBoss, on the other hand, is a full-fledged application server that provides a comprehensive platform for developing, deploying, and hosting Java-based enterprise applications. It includes support for Java EE (Enterprise Edition) standards and offers features like clustering, caching, and load balancing.
Supported Technologies:
- Apache HTTP Server supports various standard web technologies like HTTP, SSL, and CGI. It can also integrate with PHP, Perl, and other scripting languages.
- JBoss, being an application server, supports a wide range of technologies beyond just HTTP. It provides support for Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs), Java Message Service (JMS), and other Java EE technologies.
Deployment and Maintenance:
- Apache HTTP Server is relatively easier to deploy and maintain as compared to JBoss. Since it is a lightweight server, it requires fewer resources and has a smaller footprint. It is commonly used in scenarios where simplicity and performance are paramount.
- JBoss, being an application server, requires more effort and resources for deployment and maintenance. It has a larger footprint and offers more complex configuration options. It is suitable for enterprise-level applications that require extensive features and scalability.
Clustering and High Availability:
- Apache HTTP Server does not natively support clustering and high availability features. However, it can be combined with other technologies like load balancers to achieve similar functionality.
- JBoss provides built-in support for clustering and high availability. It allows multiple instances of the application server to work together, providing failover and load balancing capabilities.
Community and Support:
- Apache HTTP Server has a large and active community of developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support. It has been around for a long time and has a vast amount of documentation and resources available.
- JBoss, being part of the Red Hat family, has its own dedicated community and support infrastructure. It is backed by a professional and commercial entity, providing enterprise-level support and additional features.
Licensing:
- Apache HTTP Server is open-source software released under the Apache License 2.0. It allows users to modify and distribute the software freely.
- JBoss, being a Red Hat product, is released under various licenses depending on the edition. The community edition (WildFly) is open-source and free, while the Red Hat Enterprise Edition requires a commercial license.

Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss

Overview

Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss: What are the differences?