Dubbo vs Total.js

Overview

Apache Dubbo

Stacks33

Followers61

Votes0

GitHub Stars41.6K

Forks26.5K

Total.js

Stacks20

Followers62

Votes37

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks446

Dubbo vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Dubbo and Total.js

Architecture: Dubbo is a high-performance, lightweight, open-source RPC framework written in Java, while Total.js is a modern web application framework for Node.js. Dubbo focuses on remote method invocation, load balancing, and fault tolerance, whereas Total.js provides tools for building efficient web applications with features like data binding and real-time communication.
Language Compatibility: Dubbo primarily supports Java as its programming language, making it ideal for Java-based projects. On the other hand, Total.js is integrated with Node.js, allowing developers to use JavaScript for both server-side and client-side development. This difference in language compatibility can impact the choice of framework based on the existing skill set of the development team.
Community Support: Dubbo has a strong community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement and support, mainly within the Java ecosystem. In comparison, Total.js has a smaller but vibrant community that focuses on enhancing the framework for Node.js developers. The level of community support can influence the availability of resources, plugins, and updates for each framework.
Use Cases: Dubbo is often used in large-scale distributed systems where performance and scalability are critical factors, such as e-commerce platforms and financial services. Meanwhile, Total.js is well-suited for developing web applications with real-time capabilities, such as chat applications, IoT dashboards, and interactive websites. Understanding the specific use cases for each framework can guide developers in selecting the most suitable tool for their project requirements.
Learning Curve: Due to its deep integration with Java and complex features like service governance, Dubbo may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the framework or unfamiliar with Java ecosystem standards. In contrast, Total.js provides a more streamlined development experience with its simplified API, intuitive architecture, and comprehensive documentation, making it more accessible for developers transitioning from other web frameworks.
Scalability and Performance: Dubbo is optimized for high-performance communication between distributed services, providing features like load balancing, protocol serialization, and service discovery to enhance scalability and efficiency. On the other hand, Total.js offers built-in support for real-time communication through WebSockets and event-driven architecture, enabling developers to create responsive and interactive applications with lower latency. Understanding the specific scalability and performance requirements of a project can help in choosing the framework that meets those needs effectively.

In Summary, Dubbo and Total.js differ in architecture focus, language compatibility, community support, use cases, learning curve, and scalability/performance optimizations. Developers should consider these key differences when selecting the most suitable framework for their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Dubbo	Total.js
It is a high-performance, light weight, java based RPC framework. Dubbo offers three key functionalities, which include interface based remote call, fault tolerance & load balancing, and automatic service registration & discovery.	It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC
Transparent interface based RPC; Intelligent load balancing; Automatic service registration and discovery; High extensibility	Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars 41.6K	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks 26.5K	GitHub Forks 446
Stacks 33	Stacks 20
Followers 61	Followers 62
Votes 0	Votes 37
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 Rapid development 5 Fast 4 Great support 4 Low-code tools 3 Npm Cons 3 Lack of source code documentation 2 Developed as "one man show" 2 Poor design 2 Messes up global namespace and default prototypes 2 Poor design - 4000 line files
Integrations
Java IntelliJ IDEA Spring Framework Eclipse	npm Node.js PostGraphile Sentry

What are some alternatives to Apache Dubbo, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Dubbo vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Dubbo and Total.js

Architecture: Dubbo is a high-performance, lightweight, open-source RPC framework written in Java, while Total.js is a modern web application framework for Node.js. Dubbo focuses on remote method invocation, load balancing, and fault tolerance, whereas Total.js provides tools for building efficient web applications with features like data binding and real-time communication.
Language Compatibility: Dubbo primarily supports Java as its programming language, making it ideal for Java-based projects. On the other hand, Total.js is integrated with Node.js, allowing developers to use JavaScript for both server-side and client-side development. This difference in language compatibility can impact the choice of framework based on the existing skill set of the development team.
Community Support: Dubbo has a strong community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement and support, mainly within the Java ecosystem. In comparison, Total.js has a smaller but vibrant community that focuses on enhancing the framework for Node.js developers. The level of community support can influence the availability of resources, plugins, and updates for each framework.
Use Cases: Dubbo is often used in large-scale distributed systems where performance and scalability are critical factors, such as e-commerce platforms and financial services. Meanwhile, Total.js is well-suited for developing web applications with real-time capabilities, such as chat applications, IoT dashboards, and interactive websites. Understanding the specific use cases for each framework can guide developers in selecting the most suitable tool for their project requirements.
Learning Curve: Due to its deep integration with Java and complex features like service governance, Dubbo may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the framework or unfamiliar with Java ecosystem standards. In contrast, Total.js provides a more streamlined development experience with its simplified API, intuitive architecture, and comprehensive documentation, making it more accessible for developers transitioning from other web frameworks.
Scalability and Performance: Dubbo is optimized for high-performance communication between distributed services, providing features like load balancing, protocol serialization, and service discovery to enhance scalability and efficiency. On the other hand, Total.js offers built-in support for real-time communication through WebSockets and event-driven architecture, enabling developers to create responsive and interactive applications with lower latency. Understanding the specific scalability and performance requirements of a project can help in choosing the framework that meets those needs effectively.

Dubbo vs Total.js

Overview